Intervention effectmodel-written summary

PAR interception was higher for November 10 bed-planted wheat under the stated irrigation treatment.

A claim from Effect of sowing time, planting methods and irrigation scheduling on yield response, water and radiation-use efficiencies of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Punjab, India · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAR interception was higher for November 10 bed-planted wheat under the stated irrigation treatment.

Treatment
10 No- vember sowing under bed planting in I irrigation treatmente0
Outcome
PAR interceptione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PAR interception was also higher in 10 No- vember sowing under bed planting in I irrigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1074
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–150

Title

Effect of sowing time, planting methods and irrigation scheduling on yield response, water and radiation-use efficiencies of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Punjab, India

L.K. DHALIWAL; G.S. BUTTAR; P.K. KINGRA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v65i1.2968

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-63e4f0bb5c84eebf24c2f4a24a01ec8a07ee5fbb1c4719fd4f2dd6a079abaac0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 32 positive, 18 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.