Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Restricted water supply reduced leaf water potential, stomatal conductance and leaf photosynthetic rate in wheat.

A claim from Early Season Drought Largely Reduces Grain Yield in Wheat Cultivars with Smaller Root Systems · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Restricted water supply reduced leaf water potential, stomatal conductance and leaf photosynthetic rate in wheat.

Treatment
restricted water supplye0
Outcome
Ψleaf, stomatal conductance, leaf photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67
e0

“The restricted water supply reduced Ψleaf, stomatal conductance, leaf photosynthetic rate, shoot and root biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–805

Title

Early Season Drought Largely Reduces Grain Yield in Wheat Cultivars with Smaller Root Systems

Victoria Figueroa-Bustos; Jairo A. Palta; Yinglong Chen; et al. Plants 2019. doi:10.3390/plants8090305

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-2c6f7061393274eda6e4f35a6e988619af83e26af9112b593f24cc0aa0d9aeb6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 32 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Subsurface drip increased net photosynthesis by about 10% versus flood irrigation.

    Water-Saving Potential of Subsurface Drip Irrigation For Winter Wheat · 2019 · compared with flood irrigation

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    The mean photosynthetically active radiation capture ratio in W3 was significantly higher than in W1, W2 and W4, especially at 20, 40 and 60 cm plant heights.

    Radiation Interception, Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Senescence of Flag leaves in Winter Wheat under Supplemental Irrigation · 2017 · compared with W1, W2 and W4

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    The automated irrigation system gave higher photosynthesis rates in wheat than manual irrigation.

    Evaluation of the effectiveness of an automated irrigation system using wheat crops · 2011 · compared with manual one

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Irrigating two or three times increased late-season PAR capture.

    Biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency of winter wheat under deficit irrigation regimes · 2009

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Four irrigation treatments increased photosynthetic rate from 9.33 to 13.03 in 2002-2003 compared with one irrigation treatment.

    WATER STRESS AND NITROGEN MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ON GAS EXCHANGE, WATER RELATIONS, AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY IN WHEAT · 2011 · compared with one irrigation treatment

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Irrigation increased total PAR capture ratio and leaf area index.

    Effects of Irrigation and Precision Planting Patterns on Photosynthetic Product of Wheat · 2016

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    RDI significantly improved leaf photosynthesis and root respiration under post-anthesis stress.

    Effect of Early-Stage Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Stem Lodging Resistance, Leaf Photosynthesis, Root Respiration and Yield Stability of Winter Wheat under Post-Anthesis Water Stress Conditions · 2016 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Raised-bed wheat had greater leaf photosynthetic capacity, PSII potential and actual quantum yield than conventional wheat.

    A Root‐Zone Soil Regime of Wheat: Physiological and Growth Responses to Furrow Irrigation in Raised Bed Planting in Northern China · 2010 · compared with conventional planting

    Opposite direction

41 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.