Paper · 2009 · Plant Soil and Environment

Biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency of winter wheat under deficit irrigation regimes

Q. Li; M. Liu; J. Zhang; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

To better understand the potential for improving biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency (RUE) of winter wheat under deficit irrigation regimes, in 2006-2007 and 2007-2008, an experiment was conducted at the Luancheng Experimental Station of Chinese Academy of Science to study the effects of deficit irrigation regimes on the photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), biomass accumulation, grain yield, and RUE of winter wheat. In this experiment, field experiment involving winter wheat with 1, 2 and 3 irrigation applications at sowing, jointing, or heading stages was conducted, and total irrigation water was all controlled at 120 mm. The results indicate that irrigation 2 or 3 times could help to increase the PAR capture ratio in the later growing season of winter wheat; this result was mainly due to the changes in the vertical distributions of leaf area index (LAI) and a significant increase of the LAI at 0-20 cm above the ground surface (LSD, P < 0.05). Compared with irrigation only once during the growing season of winter wheat, irrigation 2 times significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) increased aboveground dry matter at maturity; irrigation at sowing and heading or jointing and heading stages significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) improved the grain yield, and irrigation at jointing and heading stages provided the highest RUE (0.56 g/mol). Combining the grain yield and RUE, it can be concluded that irrigation at jointing and heading stages has higher grain yield and RUE, which will offer a sound measurement for developing deficit irrigation regimes in North China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigating two or three times increased late-season PAR capture.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
irrigation 2 or 3 timese0
Outcome
PAR capture ratioe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation 2 or 3 times could help to increase the PAR capture ratio in the later growing season of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased lower-canopy LAI.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
0-20 cm above the ground surfacee0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase of the LAI at 0-20 cm above the ground surface (LSD, P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations increased aboveground dry matter at maturity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
irrigation 2 timese0
Outcome
aboveground dry matter at maturitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
irrigation only oncee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with irrigation only once during the growing season of winter wheat, irrigation 2 times significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) increased aboveground dry matter at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at sowing and heading improved grain yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation at sowing and headinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation at sowing and heading or jointing and heading stages significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) improved the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at jointing and heading improved grain yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
jointing and heading stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation at sowing and heading or jointing and heading stages significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) improved the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jointing and heading irrigation gave the highest RUE, 0.56 g/mol.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation at jointing and heading stagese0
Outcome
RUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.56 g/mole0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation at jointing and heading stages provided the highest RUE (0.56 g/mol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 32 positive, 18 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.