Paper · 2010 · Plant Soil and Environment

Grain yield and quality of winter wheat in different planting patterns under deficit irrigation regimes

Q.Q. Li; X.B. Zhou; Y.H. Chen; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Limited water resources restrict winter wheat grain yield and quality in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of North China, and establishing optimal planting patterns according to crop water requirements is the key factor for achieving rational water use. In this paper, 4 planting patterns were applied, namely, uniform row (30 cm; traditional pattern), wide (40 cm)-narrow (20 cm) row, furrow (double lines in the furrow with 20 cm spacing, and 40 cm between furrows), and seed bed (double lines on the bed with 20 cm spacing, and 40 cm between beds). Each planting pattern was irrigated twice during the jointing and heading stages, and total irrigation water was controlled at 120 mm. Grain yield was significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns, by 73.4, 64.3, and 53.4 g/m2, respectively, in 2004-2005 and by 54.3, 42.6, and 30.2 g/m2, respectively, in 2005-2006, mainly because of a significant (LSD, P < 0.05) increase in the spike and kernel numbers. These results were caused by changes in the contribution of dry matter remobilization to grain yield (CDMRG); the CDMRG was higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns by 5.1%, 4.3%, and 2.9%, respectively. Gliadin and glutenin contents in the furrow planting pattern were 4.67% and 5.85%, respectively, and were significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher than those in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns; however, the furrow planting pattern had no significant (LSD, P < 0.05) effect on albumin and globulin contents. Dough development time (DDT) and dough stable time (DST) in the furrow planting pattern were 5.6 min and 8.8 min, respectively; they were significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) improved compared to those in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns; however, there were no significant (LSD, P < 0.05) differences in dough breakdown time (DBT) between any of the planting patterns. These results suggest that the furrow planting pattern combined with deficit irrigation during the jointing and heading stages can be applied to winter wheat production in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of North China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat grain yield was significantly higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row pattern by 73.4 g/m2 in 2004-2005.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
73.4e0
Qualifier
2004-2005e0
Comparator
uniform rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns, by 73.4, 64.3, and 53.4 g/m2, respectively, in 2004-2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat grain yield was significantly higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the wide-narrow row pattern by 64.3 g/m2 in 2004-2005.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
64.3e0
Qualifier
2004-2005e0
Comparator
wide-narrow rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns, by 73.4, 64.3, and 53.4 g/m2, respectively, in 2004-2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat grain yield was significantly higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the seed bed pattern by 53.4 g/m2 in 2004-2005.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
53.4e0
Qualifier
2004-2005e0
Comparator
seed bede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns, by 73.4, 64.3, and 53.4 g/m2, respectively, in 2004-2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat grain yield was significantly higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row pattern by 54.3 g/m2 in 2005-2006.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
54.3e0
Qualifier
2005-2006e0
Comparator
uniform rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns, by 73.4, 64.3, and 53.4 g/m2, respectively, in 2004-2005 and by 54.3, 42.6, and 30.2 g/m2, respectively, in 2005-2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat grain yield was significantly higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the wide-narrow row pattern by 42.6 g/m2 in 2005-2006.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
42.6e0
Qualifier
2005-2006e0
Comparator
wide-narrow rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns, by 73.4, 64.3, and 53.4 g/m2, respectively, in 2004-2005 and by 54.3, 42.6, and 30.2 g/m2, respectively, in 2005-2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat grain yield was significantly higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the seed bed pattern by 30.2 g/m2 in 2005-2006.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
30.2e0
Qualifier
2005-2006e0
Comparator
seed bede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns, by 73.4, 64.3, and 53.4 g/m2, respectively, in 2004-2005 and by 54.3, 42.6, and 30.2 g/m2, respectively, in 2005-2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The furrow planting pattern significantly increased spike and kernel numbers of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
spike and kernel numberse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher in the furrow planting pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–762 · show in text ↑
e1

“mainly because of a significant (LSD, P < 0.05) increase in the spike and kernel numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The contribution of dry matter remobilization to grain yield (CDMRG) of winter wheat was higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row pattern by 5.1%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
CDMRGe0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.1%e0
Comparator
uniform rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CDMRG was higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns by 5.1%, 4.3%, and 2.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The contribution of dry matter remobilization to grain yield (CDMRG) of winter wheat was higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the wide-narrow row pattern by 4.3%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
CDMRGe0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.3%e0
Comparator
wide-narrow rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CDMRG was higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns by 5.1%, 4.3%, and 2.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The contribution of dry matter remobilization to grain yield (CDMRG) of winter wheat was higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the seed bed pattern by 2.9%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
CDMRGe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.9%e0
Comparator
seed bede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CDMRG was higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns by 5.1%, 4.3%, and 2.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat gliadin content in the furrow planting pattern was 4.67%, significantly higher than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row and seed bed planting patterns.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
Gliadine0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.67%e0
Comparator
uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gliadin and glutenin contents in the furrow planting pattern were 4.67% and 5.85%, respectively, and were significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher than those in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat glutenin content in the furrow planting pattern was 5.85%, significantly higher than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row and seed bed planting patterns.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
glutenin contentse0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.85%e0
Comparator
uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gliadin and glutenin contents in the furrow planting pattern were 4.67% and 5.85%, respectively, and were significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher than those in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The furrow planting pattern had no significant effect on albumin and globulin contents of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
albumin and globulin contentse0
Direction
no significant (LSD, P < 0.05) effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the furrow planting pattern had no significant (LSD, P < 0.05) effect on albumin and globulin contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1654 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat Dough development time (DDT) in the furrow planting pattern was 5.6 min, significantly improved compared with the uniform row, wide-narrow row and seed bed planting patterns.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
Dough development time (DDT)e0
Direction
improvede0
Value
5.6 mine0
Comparator
uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dough development time (DDT) and dough stable time (DST) in the furrow planting pattern were 5.6 min and 8.8 min, respectively; they were significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) improved compared to those in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1918 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat dough stable time (DST) in the furrow planting pattern was 8.8 min, significantly improved compared with the uniform row, wide-narrow row and seed bed planting patterns.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
dough stable time (DST)e0
Direction
improvede0
Value
8.8 mine0
Comparator
uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dough development time (DDT) and dough stable time (DST) in the furrow planting pattern were 5.6 min and 8.8 min, respectively; they were significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) improved compared to those in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1918 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no significant differences in dough breakdown time (DBT) of winter wheat between any of the planting patterns.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
planting patternse0
Outcome
dough breakdown time (DBT)e0
Direction
no significant (LSD, P < 0.05) differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant (LSD, P < 0.05) differences in dough breakdown time (DBT) between any of the planting patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1929–2049 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the furrow planting pattern combined with deficit irrigation at jointing and heading can be applied to winter wheat production in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of North China.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
furrow planting pattern combined with deficit irrigation during the jointing and heading stagese0
Outcome
can be applied to winter wheat productione0
Setting
Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of North Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the furrow planting pattern combined with deficit irrigation during the jointing and heading stages can be applied to winter wheat production in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2078–2262 · show in text ↑

irrigation · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 14 positive, 24 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.