Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Winter wheat grain yield was significantly higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row pattern by 73.4 g/m2 in 2004-2005.

A claim from Grain yield and quality of winter wheat in different planting patterns under deficit irrigation regimes · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat grain yield was significantly higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row pattern by 73.4 g/m2 in 2004-2005.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
furrow planting patterne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
73.4e0
Qualifier
2004-2005e0
Comparator
uniform rowe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher in the furrow planting pattern than in the uniform row, wide-narrow row, and seed bed planting patterns, by 73.4, 64.3, and 53.4 g/m2, respectively, in 2004-2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–893
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39

Title

Grain yield and quality of winter wheat in different planting patterns under deficit irrigation regimes

Q.Q. Li; X.B. Zhou; Y.H. Chen; et al. Plant Soil and Environment 2010. doi:10.17221/14/2010-pse

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-9a20daf3cf3a59f29485d22c5be21b2e18b5d3ec1d57081693f2b03b891961f6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.