Paper · 2017 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in wheat as affected by genotype and irrigation

Yinghua Zhang; Qingwu Xue; Jinpeng Li; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To investigate the genotypic differences of dry matter (DM) and nitrogen (N) accumulation and remobilization as well as the photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaf during grain filling under water-limited conditions, nine winter wheat cultivars were planted under two irrigation treatments including W0 (no irrigation applied during spring) and W2 (1500 m3 ha−1 applied 50% at stem elongation and 50% at anthesis). Results showed that cultivar and irrigation significantly affected the accumulation and remobilization of DM and N as well as the photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaf. No irrigation in spring on average decreased the photosynthetic rate of flag leaf, accelerated leaf senescence, and consequently decreased the accumulation of DM and N, but increased the ear distribution ratio and the remobilization and contribution of DM and N in leaf and stem to grain. Maintaining high photosynthetic activity and promoting DM and N distribution in ear and the remobilization of DM and N in leaf and stem may lead to higher grain filling rate and lower yield loss under water-limited conditions in North China Plain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and irrigation significantly affected the accumulation and remobilization of dry matter and nitrogen in winter wheat.

Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
accumulation and remobilization of DM and Ne1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in wheat as affected by genotype and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivar and irrigation significantly affected the accumulation and remobilization of DM and N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation in spring decreased the photosynthetic rate of flag leaf in winter wheat.

Organ / stage
flag leafe2
Treatment
No irrigation in springe2
Outcome
photosynthetic rate of flag leafe2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in wheat as affected by genotype and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“No irrigation in spring on average decreased the photosynthetic rate of flag leaf, accelerated leaf senescence, and consequently decreased the accumulation of DM and N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation in spring accelerated leaf senescence in winter wheat.

Treatment
No irrigation in springe2
Outcome
leaf senescencee2
Direction
acceleratede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in wheat as affected by genotype and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“No irrigation in spring on average decreased the photosynthetic rate of flag leaf, accelerated leaf senescence, and consequently decreased the accumulation of DM and N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation in spring decreased the accumulation of dry matter and nitrogen in winter wheat.

Treatment
No irrigation in springe2
Outcome
accumulation of DM and Ne2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in wheat as affected by genotype and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“No irrigation in spring on average decreased the photosynthetic rate of flag leaf, accelerated leaf senescence, and consequently decreased the accumulation of DM and N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation in spring increased the ear distribution ratio of dry matter and nitrogen in winter wheat.

Treatment
No irrigation in springe2
Outcome
ear distribution ratioe3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in wheat as affected by genotype and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“No irrigation in spring on average decreased the photosynthetic rate of flag leaf, accelerated leaf senescence, and consequently decreased the accumulation of DM and N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–761 · show in text ↑
e3

“but increased the ear distribution ratio and the remobilization and contribution of DM and N in leaf and stem to grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation in spring increased the remobilization and contribution of dry matter and nitrogen from leaf and stem to grain in winter wheat.

Organ / stage
leaf and steme3
Treatment
No irrigation in springe2
Outcome
remobilization and contribution of DM and Ne3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in wheat as affected by genotype and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“No irrigation in spring on average decreased the photosynthetic rate of flag leaf, accelerated leaf senescence, and consequently decreased the accumulation of DM and N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–761 · show in text ↑
e3

“but increased the ear distribution ratio and the remobilization and contribution of DM and N in leaf and stem to grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–881 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Maintaining high photosynthetic activity and promoting DM and N distribution to the ear may lead to a higher grain filling rate under water-limited conditions in the North China Plain.

Outcome
grain filling ratee4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
Maintaining high photosynthetic activitye4
Setting
North China Plaine4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in wheat as affected by genotype and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“Maintaining high photosynthetic activity and promoting DM and N distribution in ear and the remobilization of DM and N in leaf and stem may lead to higher grain filling rate and lower yield loss under water-limited conditions in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1129 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Maintaining high photosynthetic activity and promoting DM and N distribution to the ear may lead to lower yield loss under water-limited conditions in the North China Plain.

Outcome
yield losse4
Direction
lowere4
Qualifier
Maintaining high photosynthetic activitye4
Setting
North China Plaine4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in wheat as affected by genotype and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“Maintaining high photosynthetic activity and promoting DM and N distribution in ear and the remobilization of DM and N in leaf and stem may lead to higher grain filling rate and lower yield loss under water-limited conditions in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1129 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 32 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.