Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging at tillering and jointing-booting significantly reduced photosynthetic rate and transpiration.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- waterlogging treatments at tillering and jointing-booting stagese0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic rate (P N) and transpiration (E)e0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat”
e0“Compared with the control, waterlogging treatments at tillering and jointing-booting stages reduced photosynthetic rate (P N) and transpiration (E) significantly”
Title
Photosynthesis and growth of winter wheat in response to waterlogging at different growth stages
G. C. Shao; J. J. Lan; S. E. Yu; et al. Photosynthetica 2013. doi:10.1007/s11099-013-0039-9
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased average leaf water-use efficiency by 3.3% and 3.4% in both years.
- Observation Photosynthetic parameters returned to control levels after drainage.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging lowered the Fv/Fm ratio, particularly at the first two stages.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging strongly reduced root length, root mass and root/shoot ratio.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging strongly reduced total dry mass and leaf area index.
- Association Responses to waterlogging were greater in vegetative than generative plants.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging at tillering significantly reduced panicle number per hectare.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging at jointing-booting and flowering onset significantly reduced spikelets per panicle.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased grain yield by 8.2-11.3% relative to control.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging at the milky stage showed no significant difference in yield components or grain yield from control.