Claim · model-written summary
Sweep tillage with 2,4-D returned $36 per hectare profit to an owner operator.
- Treatment
- Sweep tillage at 3 wk intervals combined with 2,4-De0
- Outcome
- profit for an owner-operatore0
- Direction
- profite0
- Value
- $36 ha −1e0
- Qualifier
- $15 ha −1 losse0
- Comparator
- no herbicide or tillage treatmente0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Verbatim
e0“Sweep tillage at 3 wk intervals combined with 2,4-D resulted in $36 ha −1 profit for an owner-operator compared to $15 ha −1 loss with no herbicide or tillage treatment”
Title
Allen F. Wiese; Clay D. Salisbury; Brent W. Bean; et al. Weed Science 1996. doi:10.1017/s0043174500094443
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect All treatments controlled bindweed over two fallow periods and wheat crops.
- Intervention effect All treatments roughly doubled winter wheat yield versus control.
- Intervention effect Untreated management lost $15 per hectare for the owner operator.
- Intervention effect No tillage systems lost $35 per hectare on average.
- Intervention effect Other bindweed control treatments lost $35 to $186 per hectare.
- Intervention effect Long term calculated profit was $136 per hectare for sweep tillage with 2,4-D.
- Intervention effect Long term calculated profit was $78 per hectare for no tillage.
- Intervention effect Long term calculated profit for untreated management was negative $50 per hectare.
- Intervention effect The owner received $90 per hectare under tillage with 2,4-D in the rental arrangement.
- Intervention effect The owner lost $33 per hectare with no tillage in the rental arrangement.
- Intervention effect The owner received $43 per hectare under untreated management in the rental arrangement.
- Observation The tenant lost $24 to $69 per hectare across the three systems.
- Recommendation Owners should modify rental agreements during bindweed control.