Paper · 2013 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Impact of native phosphate solubilizing bacteria on the growth and development of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) plants

Cecilia Lara; Sixto C Sanes; Luis Oviedo

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This work was aimed at evaluating the activity of native phosphate solubilizing bacteria on growth and development of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) plants. Bacteria were isolated from the Departament of Sucre (Colombia) soil using selective media (NBRIP), further identified by macroscopic and microscopic observation and biochemically characterized using the API System. Their ability to solublize phosphate was then evaluated using the vanadomolybdate acid phosphate colorimetric method. The microorganisms of the highest phosphate solubilizing capacity (Enterobacter sp. and Klebsiella sp.) were multiplied up to concentrations of 106, 107 and 108 c.f.u./mL and then evaluated on radish seeds. Eight treatments were used including witness control and commercial control. Biometric variables, root length, leaf area and dry weight, for treatments T5 (biopreparation with Klebsiella sp., 107 c.f.u./mL) and T1 (biopreparation with Enterobacter sp.,106 u.f.c./mL) were statistically higher than the control treatment. In addition, no significant differences regarding dry weight were found with respect to T7 (chemical fertilizer). The growth and development of radish plants were improved in treatments inoculated with bacteria when compared to controls, confirming the positive effect of phosphate solubilizing activity of the native strains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterobacter sp. and Klebsiella sp. had the highest phosphate-solubilizing capacity.

Taxon
radish (Raphanus sativus L.)Raphanus sativust0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp.Enterobactere0symbiont
Outcome
phosphate solubilizing capacitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microorganisms of the highest phosphate solubilizing capacity (Enterobacter sp. and Klebsiella sp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish (Raphanus sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Klebsiella sp. treatment T5 produced statistically higher radish root length, leaf area and dry weight than the control.

Taxon
radish (Raphanus sativus L.)Raphanus sativust0
Treatment
T5 (biopreparation with Klebsiella sp., 107 c.f.u./mL)e0
Interactor
Klebsiella sp.Klebsiellae0symbiont
Outcome
root length, leaf area and dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length, leaf area and dry weight, for treatments T5 (biopreparation with Klebsiella sp., 107 c.f.u./mL) and T1 (biopreparation with Enterobacter sp.,106 u.f.c./mL) were statistically higher than the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish (Raphanus sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterobacter sp. treatment T1 produced statistically higher radish root length, leaf area and dry weight than the control.

Taxon
radish (Raphanus sativus L.)Raphanus sativust0
Treatment
T1 (biopreparation with Enterobacter sp.,106 u.f.c./mL)e0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp.Enterobactere0symbiont
Outcome
root length, leaf area and dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length, leaf area and dry weight, for treatments T5 (biopreparation with Klebsiella sp., 107 c.f.u./mL) and T1 (biopreparation with Enterobacter sp.,106 u.f.c./mL) were statistically higher than the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish (Raphanus sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated radish treatments did not differ significantly from chemical fertilizer T7 in dry weight.

Taxon
radish (Raphanus sativus L.)Raphanus sativust0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
T7 (chemical fertilizer)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences regarding dry weight were found with respect to T7 (chemical fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish (Raphanus sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑

Klebsiella · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.