Paper · 2011 · Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (University of Kassel)

Clay pot irrigation for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) production in the north east semiarid region of Ethiopia

Tesfaye, Tibebu; Tesfaye, Kindie; Woldetsadik, Kebede

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Water shortage is one of the major constraints for production of horticultural crops in arid and semiarid regions. A field experiment was conducted to determine irrigation water and fertilizer use efficiency, growth and yield of tomato under clay pot irrigation at the experimental site of Sekota Dryland Agricultural Research Center, Lalibela, Ethiopia in 2009/10. The experiment comprised of five treatments including furrow irrigated control and clay pot irrigation with different plant population and fertilization methods, which were arranged in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The highest total and marketable fruit yields were obtained from clay pot irrigation combined with application of nitrogen fertilizer with irrigation water irrespective of difference in plant population. The clay pot irrigation had seasonal water use of up to 143.71 mm, which resulted in significantly higher water use efficiency (33.62 kg m-3) as compared to the furrow irrigation, which had a seasonal water use of 485.50 mm, and a water use efficiency of 6.67 kg m-3. Application of nitrogen fertilizer with irrigation water in clay pots improved fertilizer use efficiency of tomato by up to 52% than band application with furrow or clay pot irrigation. Thus, clay pot irrigation with 33,333 plants ha-1 and nitrogen fertilizer application with irrigation water in clay pots was the best method for increasing the yield of tomato while economizing the use of water and nitrogen fertilizer in a semiarid environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clay pot irrigation combined with nitrogen fertilizer applied with irrigation water gave the highest total and marketable tomato fruit yields.

Treatment
clay pot irrigation combined with application of nitrogen fertilizer with irrigation watere0
Outcome
total and marketable fruit yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Sekota Dryland Agricultural Research Center, Lalibela, Ethiopiae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total and marketable fruit yields were obtained from clay pot irrigation combined with application of nitrogen fertilizer with irrigation water irrespective of difference in plant population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–811 · show in text ↑
e4

“A field experiment was conducted to determine irrigation water and fertilizer use efficiency, growth and yield of tomato under clay pot irrigation at the experimental site of Sekota Dryland Agricultural Research Center, Lalibela, Ethiopia in 2009/10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clay pot irrigation had significantly higher water use efficiency than furrow irrigation, 33.62 kg m-3 against 6.67 kg m-3.

Treatment
clay pot irrigatione1
Outcome
water use efficiencye1
Direction
highere1
Value
33.62 kg m-3e1
Comparator
furrow irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The clay pot irrigation had seasonal water use of up to 143.71 mm, which resulted in significantly higher water use efficiency (33.62 kg m-3) as compared to the furrow irrigation, which had a seasonal water use of 485.50 mm, and a water use efficiency of 6.67 kg m-3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–1079 · show in text ↑
e4

“A field experiment was conducted to determine irrigation water and fertilizer use efficiency, growth and yield of tomato under clay pot irrigation at the experimental site of Sekota Dryland Agricultural Research Center, Lalibela, Ethiopia in 2009/10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clay pot irrigation had lower seasonal water use than furrow irrigation, 143.71 mm against 485.50 mm.

Treatment
clay pot irrigatione1
Outcome
seasonal water usee1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
143.71 mme1
Qualifier
485.50 mme1
Comparator
furrow irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The clay pot irrigation had seasonal water use of up to 143.71 mm, which resulted in significantly higher water use efficiency (33.62 kg m-3) as compared to the furrow irrigation, which had a seasonal water use of 485.50 mm, and a water use efficiency of 6.67 kg m-3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–1079 · show in text ↑
e4

“A field experiment was conducted to determine irrigation water and fertilizer use efficiency, growth and yield of tomato under clay pot irrigation at the experimental site of Sekota Dryland Agricultural Research Center, Lalibela, Ethiopia in 2009/10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer applied with irrigation water in clay pots improved tomato fertilizer use efficiency by up to 52% compared with band application.

Treatment
Application of nitrogen fertilizer with irrigation water in clay potse2
Outcome
fertilizer use efficiencye2
Direction
improvede2
Value
52%e2
Comparator
band application with furrow or clay pot irrigatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Application of nitrogen fertilizer with irrigation water in clay pots improved fertilizer use efficiency of tomato by up to 52% than band application with furrow or clay pot irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1265 · show in text ↑
e4

“A field experiment was conducted to determine irrigation water and fertilizer use efficiency, growth and yield of tomato under clay pot irrigation at the experimental site of Sekota Dryland Agricultural Research Center, Lalibela, Ethiopia in 2009/10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–364 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Clay pot irrigation with 33,333 plants per ha and nitrogen applied with irrigation water is the best method for increasing tomato yield in a semiarid environment.

Treatment
clay pot irrigation with 33,333 plants ha-1e3
Outcome
increasing the yield of tomatoe3
Qualifier
while economizing the use of water and nitrogen fertilizere3
Setting
in a semiarid environmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“clay pot irrigation with 33,333 plants ha-1 and nitrogen fertilizer application with irrigation water in clay pots was the best method for increasing the yield of tomato while economizing the use of water and nitrogen fertilizer in a semiarid environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1527 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 39 positive, 20 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 117 positive, 30 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.