Paper · 2007 · Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

Nitrogen dynamics in soil as affected by fertigation strategies and frequencies for drip-irrigated tomato

Bei Li

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in a solar-heated greenhouse with drip-irrigated tomato to investigate the effects of drip fertigation strategy and frequency on nitrate dynamics, spatial distribution of nitrate, apparent recovery of nitrogen and fertilizer use efficiency in growing season. The results showed that the strategy of applying nutrient at the beginning resulted in a uniform distribution of nitrate in different layers and nitrate in upper layers increased as the fertilization time was transferred towards the end of an irrigation cycle. Nitrate varied more unevenly as frequency decreased during the growing season. Nitrate accumulated at the lateral boundary of the wetted volume, but no significant accumulation was found at the vertical boundary. As the fertilization time was transferred towards the beginning of an irrigation cycle, potential of nitrate moving towards the boundary of wetted volume was more obviously. Accumulation of nitrate in the profile declined with fertilization frequency. Fertilizer use efficiency declined as the fertilization time was transferred towards the end of an irrigation cycle. On this basis, the optimal fertilization strategy was suggested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying nutrients at the beginning of irrigation yielded uniform nitrate distribution across soil layers.

Treatment
applying nutrient at the beginninge0
Outcome
uniform distribution of nitrate in different layerse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the strategy of applying nutrient at the beginning resulted in a uniform distribution of nitrate in different layers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–432 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later fertilization during irrigation increased nitrate in upper soil layers.

Treatment
fertilization time was transferred towards the end of an irrigation cyclee0
Outcome
nitrate in upper layerse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrate in upper layers increased as the fertilization time was transferred towards the end of an irrigation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower fertigation frequency made nitrate distribution more uneven during the growing season.

Treatment
frequency decreasede0
Outcome
Nitratee0
Direction
more unevenlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate varied more unevenly as frequency decreased during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate accumulated at the lateral boundary of the wetted soil volume.

Outcome
Nitrate accumulated at the lateral boundary of the wetted volumee0
Direction
accumulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate accumulated at the lateral boundary of the wetted volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate did not accumulate significantly at the vertical boundary of the wetted volume.

Outcome
accumulatione0
Direction
no significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant accumulation was found at the vertical boundary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moving fertilization toward the start of irrigation increased the potential for nitrate movement to the wetted-volume boundary.

Treatment
fertilization time was transferred towards the beginning of an irrigation cyclee0
Outcome
potential of nitrate moving towards the boundary of wetted volumee0
Direction
more obviouslye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As the fertilization time was transferred towards the beginning of an irrigation cycle, potential of nitrate moving towards the boundary of wetted volume was more obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-profile nitrate accumulation declined as fertilization frequency increased.

Treatment
fertilization frequencye0
Outcome
Accumulation of nitrate in the profilee0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Accumulation of nitrate in the profile declined with fertilization frequency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer use efficiency declined as fertilization moved toward the end of an irrigation cycle.

Treatment
fertilization time was transferred towards the end of an irrigation cyclee0
Outcome
Fertilizer use efficiencye0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer use efficiency declined as the fertilization time was transferred towards the end of an irrigation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested an optimal fertilization strategy based on the results.

Outcome
optimal fertilization strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimal fertilization strategy was suggested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 29 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 226 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.