Paper · 2009 · Plant and Soil

Winter wheat roots grow twice as deep as spring wheat roots, is this important for N uptake and N leaching losses?

Kristian Thorup-Kristensen; Montserrat Salmerón Cortasa; Ralf Loges

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
255
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Cropping systems comprising winter catch crops followed by spring wheat could reduce N leaching risks compared to traditional winter wheat systems in humid climates. We studied the soil mineral N (N inorg ) and root growth of winter– and spring wheat to 2.5 m depth during 3 years. The roots of the winter and spring wheat penetrated the soil at a similar rate (1.3 mm o C day −1 ) and by virtue of its longer growing period, winter wheat reached depths of 2.2 m, twice that of spring wheat (1.1 m). The deeper rooting of winter wheat was related to much lower amounts of N inorg left in the 1 to 2.5 m layer after winter wheat (81 kg N inorg ha −1 less). When growing winter catch crops before spring wheat, N content in the 1 to 2.5 m layer after spring wheat was not different from that after winter wheat. The results suggest that due to its deep rooting, winter wheat may not lead to as high levels of leaching as it is often assumed in humid climates. Deep soil and root measurements (below 1 m) in this experiment were essential to answer the questions we posed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter and spring wheat roots penetrated soil at a similar rate of 1.3 mm o C day −1.

Outcome
penetrated the soile0
Direction
similar ratee0
Value
1.3 mm o C day −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The roots of the winter and spring wheat penetrated the soil at a similar rate (1.3 mm o C day −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–381 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat roots reached 2.2 m, twice the depth of spring wheat roots at 1.1 m.

Material
winter wheate0
Outcome
depthse0
Direction
twicee0
Value
2.2 me0
Qualifier
1.1 me0
Comparator
spring wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat reached depths of 2.2 m, twice that of spring wheat (1.1 m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–498 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deeper winter wheat rooting was associated with 81 kg N inorg ha −1 less residual mineral nitrogen in the 1 to 2.5 m soil layer.

Material
winter wheate0
Outcome
N inorg left in the 1 to 2.5 m layere0
Direction
much lowere0
Value
81 kg N inorg ha −1 lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The deeper rooting of winter wheat was related to much lower amounts of N inorg left in the 1 to 2.5 m layer after winter wheat (81 kg N inorg ha −1 less)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual nitrogen in the 1 to 2.5 m layer after spring wheat preceded by winter catch crops did not differ from that after winter wheat.

Treatment
winter catch crops before spring wheate0
Outcome
N content in the 1 to 2.5 m layere0
Direction
not differente0
Comparator
winter wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When growing winter catch crops before spring wheat, N content in the 1 to 2.5 m layer after spring wheat was not different from that after winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–808 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest winter wheat may have lower leaching potential than commonly assumed in humid climates because of deep rooting.

Outcome
may not lead to as high levels of leachinge0
Qualifier
in humid climatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“due to its deep rooting, winter wheat may not lead to as high levels of leaching as it is often assumed in humid climates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–956 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Measurements of roots and soil below 1 m were essential to address the study questions.

Taxon
roote0
Outcome
essential to answer the questions we posede0
Value
below 1 me0

Verbatim

e0

“Deep soil and root measurements (below 1 m) in this experiment were essential to answer the questions we posed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1068 · show in text ↑

cover crop · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.