Paper · 2005 · Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology

Effects of early and late season defoliation on photosynthesis, growth and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

N.A. Khan; P.M. Lone

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) is characterized by a large number of leaves in the lower layers. These leaves are poorly illuminated, remain below the light compensation point and abscise at maturity. The effects of removing 50 % of all leaves taken from the lower half of the plant at 40 (pre-flowering) or 60 (post-flowering) days after sowing (DAS) were studied on photosynthesis and growth at 80 DAS and on yield at harvest. A comparison of stomatal and mesophyll effects on photosynthesis upon removal of such leaves was also made. Defoliation at 40 DAS resulted in a higher rate of photosynthesis (P N), growth and yield compared to defoliation at 60 DAS or the no defoliation control. The non-significant variation in stomatal limitation (I S), increased activity of carbonic anhydrase (CA) and constant Ci/Ca ratio in defoliated plants suggest that the main effect on P N was through enhanced mesophyll rather than stomatal effects. Defoliation at 40 DAS caused the greatest emergence of new leaves with rapid growth, which contributed to maximum leaf area as well as leaf and plant dry masses. The favourable effects of defoliation at 40 DAS on photosynthesis and growth were reflected by seed yield and attributing parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at 40 DAS gave a higher photosynthesis rate than defoliation at 60 DAS or no defoliation.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
Defoliation at 40 DASe0
Outcome
rate of photosynthesis (P N)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
defoliation at 60 DAS or the no defoliation controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Defoliation at 40 DAS resulted in a higher rate of photosynthesis (P N), growth and yield compared to defoliation at 60 DAS or the no defoliation control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at 40 DAS gave higher growth than defoliation at 60 DAS or no defoliation.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
Defoliation at 40 DASe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
defoliation at 60 DAS or the no defoliation controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Defoliation at 40 DAS resulted in a higher rate of photosynthesis (P N), growth and yield compared to defoliation at 60 DAS or the no defoliation control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at 40 DAS gave higher yield than defoliation at 60 DAS or no defoliation.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
Defoliation at 40 DASe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
defoliation at 60 DAS or the no defoliation controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Defoliation at 40 DAS resulted in a higher rate of photosynthesis (P N), growth and yield compared to defoliation at 60 DAS or the no defoliation control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal limitation showed non-significant variation in defoliated mustard plants.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
defoliated plantse0
Outcome
stomatal limitation (I S)e0
Direction
non-significant variatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The non-significant variation in stomatal limitation (I S), increased activity of carbonic anhydrase (CA) and constant Ci/Ca ratio in defoliated plants suggest that the main effect on P N was through enhanced mesophyll rather than stomatal effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonic anhydrase activity increased in defoliated mustard plants.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
defoliated plantse0
Gene
carbonic anhydrase (CA)e0
Outcome
activity of carbonic anhydrase (CA)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The non-significant variation in stomatal limitation (I S), increased activity of carbonic anhydrase (CA) and constant Ci/Ca ratio in defoliated plants suggest that the main effect on P N was through enhanced mesophyll rather than stomatal effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ci/Ca ratio stayed constant in defoliated mustard plants.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
defoliated plantse0
Outcome
Ci/Ca ratioe0
Direction
constante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The non-significant variation in stomatal limitation (I S), increased activity of carbonic anhydrase (CA) and constant Ci/Ca ratio in defoliated plants suggest that the main effect on P N was through enhanced mesophyll rather than stomatal effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that the defoliation effect on photosynthesis acted mainly through enhanced mesophyll activity rather than stomatal effects.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
defoliated plantse0
Outcome
main effect on P Ne0
Qualifier
enhanced mesophyll rather than stomatal effectse0

Verbatim

e0

“The non-significant variation in stomatal limitation (I S), increased activity of carbonic anhydrase (CA) and constant Ci/Ca ratio in defoliated plants suggest that the main effect on P N was through enhanced mesophyll rather than stomatal effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at 40 DAS caused the greatest emergence of new leaves.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
Defoliation at 40 DASe0
Outcome
emergence of new leavese0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Defoliation at 40 DAS caused the greatest emergence of new leaves with rapid growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at 40 DAS led to maximum leaf area and leaf and plant dry masses.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
Defoliation at 40 DASe0
Outcome
maximum leaf area as well as leaf and plant dry massese0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Defoliation at 40 DAS caused the greatest emergence of new leaves with rapid growth, which contributed to maximum leaf area as well as leaf and plant dry masses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑