Paper · 1999 · New Phytologist

Characterization of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in symbiosis with Allium porrum: colonization, plant growth and phosphate uptake

S. DICKSON; S. E. SMITH; F. A. SMITH

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Scutellospora calospora and Glomus sp. ‘City Beach’, were grown in soil conditions suitable for colonization of Allium porrum . Effects on plant growth and phosphate uptake were examined. Isolates of S. calospora (including the one used here) have been shown by others to vary in their stimulation of plant growth, and appear to be inefficient in the transfer of P from the fungus to the host. Our hypothesis was that such isolates of S. calospora may be more aggressive colonizers than other fungi, thus preventing growth increases or producing strong growth depressions in the host plant. In fact, inoculation with either fungus increased growth of plants in their respective soils both low in P (P 0 ) and with added P (P 1 ) by 42 d. The effect on growth due to mycorrhizal symbiosis (i.e. mycorrhizal growth response, % MGR) at 42 d was higher in plants grown in P 0 soil. Plants colonized by Glomus sp. ‘City Beach’ had a greater % MGR than plants colonized by S. calospora . Both fungi colonized plants to high levels. The percentage of root length colonized was higher in P 0 soil than in P 1 soil at 21 d. The internal development of S. calospora appeared less affected by addition of P than Glomus sp. ‘City Beach’ at the early harvests. Formation of arbuscules followed the same trends as total colonization. Shoot P concentration was significantly higher in mycorrhizal plants than in non‐mycorrhizal plants, by 21 d in P 1 soil and by 28 d in P 0 soil. Different percentage responses to added P based on total plant dry weight (% PGR) were observed at 28 and 42 d between the plants colonized by the two fungi. The increased P content due to mycorrhizal colonization (% MPR) differed with soil P. For both fungi grown in their respective soils, the response was greater in plants grown in P 0 soil. Although the isolate of S. calospora used is an aggressive arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus with some hosts, it promotes a strong positive plant growth response in A. porrum after a mild initial growth depression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with either arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus increased leek plant growth by 42 days.

Taxon
Allium porrumAllium ampeloprasume0
Treatment
inoculation with either funguse1
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
growth of plantse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Scutellospora calospora and Glomus sp. ‘City Beach’, were grown in soil conditions suitable for colonization of Allium porrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“In fact, inoculation with either fungus increased growth of plants in their respective soils both low in P (P 0 ) and with added P (P 1 ) by 42 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–770 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mycorrhizal growth response at 42 days was higher in leek grown in low-P soil.

Taxon
Allium porrumAllium ampeloprasume0
Treatment
mycorrhizal symbiosise2
Outcome
mycorrhizal growth responsee2
Direction
highere2
Setting
P 0 soile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Scutellospora calospora and Glomus sp. ‘City Beach’, were grown in soil conditions suitable for colonization of Allium porrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effect on growth due to mycorrhizal symbiosis (i.e. mycorrhizal growth response, % MGR) at 42 d was higher in plants grown in P 0 soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–910 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants colonized by Glomus sp. City Beach had a greater mycorrhizal growth response than plants colonized by S. calospora.

Taxon
Allium porrumAllium ampeloprasume0
Interactor
Glomus sp. ‘City Beach’e3symbiont
Second interactor
S. calosporaScutellospora calosporae3symbiont
Outcome
% MGRe3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
plants colonized by S. calosporae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Scutellospora calospora and Glomus sp. ‘City Beach’, were grown in soil conditions suitable for colonization of Allium porrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plants colonized by Glomus sp. ‘City Beach’ had a greater % MGR than plants colonized by S. calospora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1013 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot P concentration was significantly higher in mycorrhizal leek than in non-mycorrhizal leek, by 21 days in P1 soil and by 28 days in P0 soil.

Taxon
Allium porrumAllium ampeloprasume0
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse4
Outcome
Shoot P concentratione4
Direction
highere4
Setting
P 1 soile4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Scutellospora calospora and Glomus sp. ‘City Beach’, were grown in soil conditions suitable for colonization of Allium porrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e4

“Shoot P concentration was significantly higher in mycorrhizal plants than in non‐mycorrhizal plants, by 21 d in P 1 soil and by 28 d in P 0 soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1498 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. calospora promotes a strong positive growth response in leek after a mild initial growth depression.

Taxon
Allium porrumAllium ampeloprasume0
Interactor
S. calosporaScutellospora calosporae5symbiont
Outcome
plant growth responsee5
Direction
positivee5
Qualifier
after a mild initial growth depressione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Scutellospora calospora and Glomus sp. ‘City Beach’, were grown in soil conditions suitable for colonization of Allium porrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e5

“Although the isolate of S. calospora used is an aggressive arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus with some hosts, it promotes a strong positive plant growth response in A. porrum after a mild initial growth depression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1846–2055 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Allium ampeloprasum (leek)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.