Paper · 1984 · New Phytologist

THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENDOMYCORRHIZAL ROOT SYSTEMS V. THE DETAILED PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT OF INFECTION AND THE CONTROL OF INFECTION LEVEL BY HOST IN YOUNG LEEK PLANTS

J. G. BUWALDA; D. P. STRIBLEY; P. B. TINKER

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
53
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

S ummary Leek plants ( Allium porrum L.) were grown on partly sterilized soil, in tall pots so that roots grew downwards unimpeded, with inoculum of the vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae (Nicol. & Gerd.) Gerdemann & Trappe placed either under the seedling or dispersed uniformly throughout the soil. The age of each individual root, and the distribution of infection in single roots were both determined in each of a series of sequential harvests. The development of the root systems was unaffected by placement of inoculum. Formation of adventitious roots continued up to 42 d, when branching commenced. The rate of initiation of roots was approximately exponential but more accurately fitted a logistic function. The increase with time in total length of root for the root system ( L t ) was approximately exponential but the length of the single roots (L tr ) increased linearly. The total length of infection in whole root systems (L ir ) also increased exponentially with time, but the rate of extension for the sum of the individual lengths of infected root (infection ‘segments’) in single roots (L tr ) was linear, with an apparent delay of approx. 5 d before infection could be observed. The rate of increase in L ir was very similar for placed (0.53 cm d 1 ) and dispersed (0.58 cm d 1 ) inocula, even though the number of infection segments per root differed widely. This suggests that the host controls the rate of growth of the fungus. On this basis, and assuming each root encountered a new propagule every 4 d, it was possible to predict the lengths and numbers of infection segments in single roots. The percentage infection in whole root systems and single roots, plotted against time, showed a delay, then a sharp rise to a final constant value. This pattern of development can be explained for single roots by simple arithmetical rules. Using these simple rules, and assuming that the rate of production of adventitious roots fitted either a logistic or exponential equation, it was possible to model the development of infection up to 42 d for a whole root system either algebraically or by numerical simulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculum placement did not change leek root-system development.

Treatment
placement of inoculume0
Outcome
development of the root systemse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The development of the root systems was unaffected by placement of inoculum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adventitious roots formed until 42 d, when branching began.

Organ / stage
adventitious rootse0
Outcome
Formation of adventitious rootse0
Value
42 de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Formation of adventitious roots continued up to 42 d, when branching commenced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root initiation was approximately exponential and fitted a logistic function more accurately.

Outcome
rate of initiation of rootse0
Qualifier
more accurately fitted a logistic functione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of initiation of roots was approximately exponential but more accurately fitted a logistic function.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total root length increased approximately exponentially over time.

Outcome
total length of roote0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
approximately exponentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase with time in total length of root for the root system ( L t ) was approximately exponential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual root length increased linearly.

Outcome
length of the single rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the length of the single roots (L tr ) increased linearly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total infection length increased exponentially over time.

Outcome
total length of infectione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total length of infection in whole root systems (L ir ) also increased exponentially with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual infection segment length extended linearly after a roughly 5 d delay.

Outcome
rate of extensione0
Value
approx. 5 de0
Qualifier
lineare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of extension for the sum of the individual lengths of infected root (infection ‘segments’) in single roots (L tr ) was linear, with an apparent delay of approx. 5 d before infection could be observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Placed inoculum yielded a 0.53 cm d 1 infection-length increase rate.

Treatment
placede0
Outcome
rate of increase in L ire0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.53 cm d 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of increase in L ir was very similar for placed (0.53 cm d 1 ) and dispersed (0.58 cm d 1 ) inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dispersed inoculum yielded a 0.58 cm d 1 infection-length increase rate.

Treatment
dispersede0
Outcome
rate of increase in L ire0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.58 cm d 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of increase in L ir was very similar for placed (0.53 cm d 1 ) and dispersed (0.58 cm d 1 ) inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of infection segments per root differed widely by placement.

Outcome
number of infection segments per roote0
Direction
differed widelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of infection segments per root differed widely.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer the host controls fungal growth rate.

Outcome
rate of growth of the funguse0
Qualifier
host controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This suggests that the host controls the rate of growth of the fungus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Arithmetic rules predicted lengths and numbers of infection segments.

Outcome
lengths and numbers of infection segmentse0
Value
numberse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was possible to predict the lengths and numbers of infection segments in single roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1636 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percentage infection showed a delay, sharp rise and final constant value.

Outcome
percentage infectione0
Direction
sharp risee0
Qualifier
final constant valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage infection in whole root systems and single roots, plotted against time, showed a delay, then a sharp rise to a final constant value.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1784 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simple rules explained infection development in single roots.

Outcome
pattern of developmente0
Value
simple arithmetical rulese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This pattern of development can be explained for single roots by simple arithmetical rules.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1876 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Algebraic and numerical models represented whole-root infection through 42 d.

Outcome
development of infectione0
Value
42 de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was possible to model the development of infection up to 42 d for a whole root system either algebraically or by numerical simulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2016–2153 · show in text ↑
t0

“LEEK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–156 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Allium ampeloprasum (leek)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.