Paper · 2014 · Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Influence of Sources and Rates of Manure on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Maize (Zea mays L.) in Maiduguri, Nigeria

U U Waniyo; M M Sauwa; A L Ngala; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Lack of proper knowledge on the type and exact quantity of manure required by crops are among the major constraints to maize production in Maiduguri. Thus a pot experiment was carried out in the screen house of University of Maiduguri to assess the effects of sources and rates of manure suitable for optimum maize production in Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria. The experiment was established as completely randomized design (CRD) with 4 manure treatments, 3 rates plus 3 controls (no manure), replicated 3 times. The results showed that, yield and nutrient uptake of maize was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) influenced by treatments at 21 and 42 days after planting (DAP). Cow manure treatment on average, produced the best of growth, yield and nutrient uptake (N,P, and K uptake) of maize compared to other treatments. Also, on average, values of most parameters in the 10 and 20 t/ha rates were statistically similar or higher than those of 30 t/h/ha. However, 10t/ha rate is considered more appropriate as it produces same effects as those of 20t/ha rates. From the results, it can be concluded that application of 10t/ha cow manure is adequate for optimum maize production in Maiduguri, North-Eastern Nigeria.Keywords: Manure sources, Rates, Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake, Maize

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure treatments significantly influenced maize yield and nutrient uptake at 21 and 42 days after planting.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
yield and nutrient uptakee0
Qualifier
21 and 42 days after planting (DAP)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that, yield and nutrient uptake of maize was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) influenced by treatments at 21 and 42 days after planting (DAP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow manure gave the best maize growth compared with other treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Cow manure treatmente0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cow manure treatment on average, produced the best of growth, yield and nutrient uptake (N,P, and K uptake) of maize compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow manure gave the best maize yield compared with other treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Cow manure treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cow manure treatment on average, produced the best of growth, yield and nutrient uptake (N,P, and K uptake) of maize compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow manure gave the best maize nutrient uptake (N,P, and K uptake) compared with other treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Cow manure treatmente0
Outcome
nutrient uptake (N,P, and K uptake)e0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cow manure treatment on average, produced the best of growth, yield and nutrient uptake (N,P, and K uptake) of maize compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most parameters under 10 and 20 t/ha manure were statistically similar to or higher than at 30 t/h/ha.

Taxon
Maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
10 and 20 t/ha ratese0
Outcome
values of most parameterse0
Direction
statistically similar or highere0
Comparator
30 t/h/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, on average, values of most parameters in the 10 and 20 t/ha rates were statistically similar or higher than those of 30 t/h/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered 10t/ha more appropriate because it produced the same effects as 20t/ha.

Taxon
Maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Outcome
10t/ha rate is considered more appropriatee0
Comparator
20t/ha ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, 10t/ha rate is considered more appropriate as it produces same effects as those of 20t/ha rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 10t/ha cow manure is recommended for optimum maize production in Maiduguri.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
application of 10t/ha cow manure is adequatee0
Setting
Maiduguri, North-Eastern Nigeriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“From the results, it can be concluded that application of 10t/ha cow manure is adequate for optimum maize production in Maiduguri, North-Eastern Nigeria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1208 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.