Paper · 2023 · Journal of King Saud University - Science

Organic fertilizer sources improve the yield and quality attributes of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids by improving soil properties and nutrient uptake under drought stress

Muhammad Nadeem Shah; David L. Wright; Shabir Hussain; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In abiotic stresses, drought is the main problem in agricultural production which inhibits the plants to show off their genetic potential. Maize is not only the cereal crop of the world but also 3rd important cereal crop in Pakistan. Maize is drought-sensitive and affected at each growth and development stage. So, the organic amendment is not only the solution to mitigate the drought stress due to long-lasting moisture availability but also improves the growth, yield, quality, and nutrient uptake with improving soil properties. Therefore, a two-year field experiment during 2018 and 2019 was laid out at Agronomy Research Area, Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. Treatments included pre-screened maize hybrids: P-1429 (drought-sensitive) and Dk-6724 (drought-tolerant); pre-optimized levels of each organic fertilizer source (OFS); recommended chemical fertilizer source (CS), 10 t/ha biochar (BC), 10 t/ha farmyard manure (F.M) and 10 t/ha poultry manure (P.M); and irrigation regimes i.e normal irrigation (Ck) 100% field capacity and severe drought (SD) 50% field capacity. The Experiment was designed in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with a split-split plot arrangement and was replicated three times. Irrigation regimes were put in the main plot, organic fertilizer sources were put in the subplot and maize hybrids were put in the sub-sub plot. Different agronomic growth and yield attributes, quality attributes, crop physiology, soil physical properties, nutrient uptake, and activity of antioxidant enzymes were assessed. It resulted that in organic fertilizer sources application, 10 t/ha poultry manure and farmyard manure followed by biochar improved the growth and yield of maize hybrids significantly, under normal irrigation and severe drought. These also improve the quality of maize by improving the nutrient uptake and soil physical properties like increasing the soil porosity and decreasing the soil bulk density during consecutive years 2018 and 2019. It was also noticed that the application of organic fertilizers mitigated the adverse effect of drought by the antioxidant defense system with the production of SOD, POD and CAT.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure at 10 t/ha improved maize growth and yield significantly under normal irrigation and severe drought.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
poultry manuree1
Outcome
growth and yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
under normal irrigation and severe droughte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“10 t/ha poultry manure and farmyard manure followed by biochar improved the growth and yield of maize hybrids significantly, under normal irrigation and severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure at 10 t/ha improved maize growth and yield significantly under normal irrigation and severe drought.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
farmyard manuree1
Outcome
growth and yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
under normal irrigation and severe droughte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“10 t/ha poultry manure and farmyard manure followed by biochar improved the growth and yield of maize hybrids significantly, under normal irrigation and severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 10 t/ha improved maize growth and yield significantly under normal irrigation and severe drought.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
biochare1
Outcome
growth and yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
under normal irrigation and severe droughte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“10 t/ha poultry manure and farmyard manure followed by biochar improved the growth and yield of maize hybrids significantly, under normal irrigation and severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer sources improved the quality of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
organic fertilizer sourcese3
Outcome
quality of maizee2
Direction
improvee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“These also improve the quality of maize by improving the nutrient uptake and soil physical properties like increasing the soil porosity and decreasing the soil bulk density during consecutive years 2018 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–2027 · show in text ↑
e3

“in organic fertilizer sources application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer sources improved nutrient uptake in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
organic fertilizer sourcese3
Outcome
nutrient uptakee2
Direction
improvinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“These also improve the quality of maize by improving the nutrient uptake and soil physical properties like increasing the soil porosity and decreasing the soil bulk density during consecutive years 2018 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–2027 · show in text ↑
e3

“in organic fertilizer sources application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer sources increased soil porosity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
organic fertilizer sourcese3
Outcome
soil porositye2
Direction
increasinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“These also improve the quality of maize by improving the nutrient uptake and soil physical properties like increasing the soil porosity and decreasing the soil bulk density during consecutive years 2018 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–2027 · show in text ↑
e3

“in organic fertilizer sources application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer sources decreased soil bulk density.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
organic fertilizer sourcese3
Outcome
soil bulk densitye2
Direction
decreasinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“These also improve the quality of maize by improving the nutrient uptake and soil physical properties like increasing the soil porosity and decreasing the soil bulk density during consecutive years 2018 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–2027 · show in text ↑
e3

“in organic fertilizer sources application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers mitigated the adverse effect of drought through the antioxidant enzymes SOD, POD and CAT.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
organic fertilizerse4
Gene
SOD, POD and CATe4
Outcome
adverse effect of droughte4
Direction
mitigatede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–90 · show in text ↑
e4

“the application of organic fertilizers mitigated the adverse effect of drought by the antioxidant defense system with the production of SOD, POD and CAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2054–2206 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 83 positive, 10 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 86 positive, 17 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

biochar · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 175 positive, 18 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.