Abstract
Salinity causes the adverse effects in all physiological processes of plants. The present study aimed to investigate the potential of salt stress to enhance the accumulation of the anticancer phytochemicals in Andrographis paniculata accessions. For this purpose, 70-day-old plants were grown in different salinity levels (0.18, 4, 8, 12, and 16 dSm(-1)) on sand medium. After inducing a period of 30-day salinity stress and before flowering, all plants were harvested and the data on morphological traits, proline content and the three anticancer phytochemicals, including andrographolide (AG), neoandrographolide (NAG), and 14-deoxy-11,12-didehydroandrographolide (DDAG), were measured. The results indicated that salinity had a significant effect on the aforementioned three anticancer phytochemicals. In addition, the salt tolerance index (STI) was significantly decreased, while, except for DDAG, the content of proline, the AG, and NAG was significantly increased (P ≤ 0.01). Furthermore, it was revealed that significant differences among accessions could happen based on the total dry weight, STI, AG, and NAG. Finally, we noticed that the salinity at 12 dSm(-1) led to the maximum increase in the quantities of AG, NAG, and DDAG. In other words, under salinity stress, the tolerant accessions were capable of accumulating the higher amounts of proline, AG, and NAG than the sensitive accessions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly decreased the salt tolerance index.
- Taxon
- Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculatae2 - Treatment
- different salinity levelse1
- Outcome
- salt tolerance index (STI)e0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_in_Narshapur_forest%2C_AP_W2_IMG_0867.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the salt tolerance index (STI) was significantly decreased”
e1“different salinity levels (0.18, 4, 8, 12, and 16 dSm(-1))”
e2“Andrographis paniculata accessions”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly increased proline content.
- Taxon
- Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculatae1 - Treatment
- salt stresse2
- Outcome
- content of prolinee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_in_Narshapur_forest%2C_AP_W2_IMG_0867.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the content of proline, the AG, and NAG was significantly increased (P ≤ 0.01)”
e1“Andrographis paniculata accessions”
e2“salt stress”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly increased AG content.
- Taxon
- Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculatae1 - Treatment
- salt stresse2
- Outcome
- AGe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_in_Narshapur_forest%2C_AP_W2_IMG_0867.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the AG, and NAG was significantly increased (P ≤ 0.01)”
e1“Andrographis paniculata accessions”
e2“salt stress”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly increased NAG content.
- Taxon
- Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculatae1 - Treatment
- salt stresse2
- Outcome
- NAGe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_in_Narshapur_forest%2C_AP_W2_IMG_0867.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the AG, and NAG was significantly increased (P ≤ 0.01)”
e1“Andrographis paniculata accessions”
e2“salt stress”
Claim · model-written summary
Accessions differed significantly in total dry weight, salt tolerance index, AG and NAG.
- Taxon
- Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculatae1 - Material
- accessionse0
- Outcome
- total dry weight, STI, AG, and NAGe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_in_Narshapur_forest%2C_AP_W2_IMG_0867.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“significant differences among accessions could happen based on the total dry weight, STI, AG, and NAG”
e1“Andrographis paniculata accessions”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity at 12 dSm(-1) produced the maximum increase in AG, NAG and DDAG quantities.
- Taxon
- Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculatae1 - Treatment
- salinity at 12 dSm(-1)e0
- Outcome
- quantities of AG, NAG, and DDAGe0
- Direction
- maximum increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_in_Narshapur_forest%2C_AP_W2_IMG_0867.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the salinity at 12 dSm(-1) led to the maximum increase in the quantities of AG, NAG, and DDAG”
e1“Andrographis paniculata accessions”
Claim · model-written summary
Under salinity stress, tolerant accessions accumulated more proline, AG and NAG than sensitive accessions.
- Taxon
- Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculatae1 - Material
- tolerant accessionse0
- Outcome
- amounts of proline, AG, and NAGe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- under salinity stresse0
- Comparator
- sensitive accessionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_in_Narshapur_forest%2C_AP_W2_IMG_0867.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“under salinity stress, the tolerant accessions were capable of accumulating the higher amounts of proline, AG, and NAG than the sensitive accessions”
e1“Andrographis paniculata accessions”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · molecular: metabolites · Andrographis paniculataPositive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →salinity · tolerance: abiotic · Andrographis paniculataResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.