Paper · 2013 · BioMed Research International

Analysis of the Anticancer Phytochemicals inAndrographis paniculataNees. under Salinity Stress

Daryush Talei; Alireza Valdiani; Mahmood Maziah; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinity causes the adverse effects in all physiological processes of plants. The present study aimed to investigate the potential of salt stress to enhance the accumulation of the anticancer phytochemicals in Andrographis paniculata accessions. For this purpose, 70-day-old plants were grown in different salinity levels (0.18, 4, 8, 12, and 16 dSm(-1)) on sand medium. After inducing a period of 30-day salinity stress and before flowering, all plants were harvested and the data on morphological traits, proline content and the three anticancer phytochemicals, including andrographolide (AG), neoandrographolide (NAG), and 14-deoxy-11,12-didehydroandrographolide (DDAG), were measured. The results indicated that salinity had a significant effect on the aforementioned three anticancer phytochemicals. In addition, the salt tolerance index (STI) was significantly decreased, while, except for DDAG, the content of proline, the AG, and NAG was significantly increased (P ≤ 0.01). Furthermore, it was revealed that significant differences among accessions could happen based on the total dry weight, STI, AG, and NAG. Finally, we noticed that the salinity at 12 dSm(-1) led to the maximum increase in the quantities of AG, NAG, and DDAG. In other words, under salinity stress, the tolerant accessions were capable of accumulating the higher amounts of proline, AG, and NAG than the sensitive accessions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased the salt tolerance index.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatae2
Treatment
different salinity levelse1
Outcome
salt tolerance index (STI)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the salt tolerance index (STI) was significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–876 · show in text ↑
e1

“different salinity levels (0.18, 4, 8, 12, and 16 dSm(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–354 · show in text ↑
e2

“Andrographis paniculata accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly increased proline content.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatae1
Treatment
salt stresse2
Outcome
content of prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of proline, the AG, and NAG was significantly increased (P ≤ 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–980 · show in text ↑
e1

“Andrographis paniculata accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–244 · show in text ↑
e2

“salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly increased AG content.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatae1
Treatment
salt stresse2
Outcome
AGe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the AG, and NAG was significantly increased (P ≤ 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–980 · show in text ↑
e1

“Andrographis paniculata accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–244 · show in text ↑
e2

“salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly increased NAG content.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatae1
Treatment
salt stresse2
Outcome
NAGe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the AG, and NAG was significantly increased (P ≤ 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–980 · show in text ↑
e1

“Andrographis paniculata accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–244 · show in text ↑
e2

“salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Accessions differed significantly in total dry weight, salt tolerance index, AG and NAG.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatae1
Material
accessionse0
Outcome
total dry weight, STI, AG, and NAGe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences among accessions could happen based on the total dry weight, STI, AG, and NAG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Andrographis paniculata accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity at 12 dSm(-1) produced the maximum increase in AG, NAG and DDAG quantities.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatae1
Treatment
salinity at 12 dSm(-1)e0
Outcome
quantities of AG, NAG, and DDAGe0
Direction
maximum increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the salinity at 12 dSm(-1) led to the maximum increase in the quantities of AG, NAG, and DDAG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1237 · show in text ↑
e1

“Andrographis paniculata accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–244 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity stress, tolerant accessions accumulated more proline, AG and NAG than sensitive accessions.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatae1
Material
tolerant accessionse0
Outcome
amounts of proline, AG, and NAGe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under salinity stresse0
Comparator
sensitive accessionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under salinity stress, the tolerant accessions were capable of accumulating the higher amounts of proline, AG, and NAG than the sensitive accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1403 · show in text ↑
e1

“Andrographis paniculata accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–244 · show in text ↑

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Andrographis paniculataPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salinity · tolerance: abiotic · Andrographis paniculataResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.