Paper · 1993 · Journal of Phytopathology

Incidence of White Mold and Yield of Upright Bean Grown in Different Planting Patterns

G. Saindon; H. C. Huang; G. C. Kozub; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The commercial dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L) production system in Alberta requires irrigation and the viny cultivars currently used in this production system are prone to outbreaks of white mold caused by Sclerotinia sderotiorum (Lib.) de Bary. The use of beans with an upright growth habit has potential for alleviating the disease problem, but the narrow profile of the upright beans may warrant a different planting pattern to achieve high yield. A study was undertaken to determine the effect of between‐ and within‐row spacings on the occurrence of white mold and seed yield of upright beans. An experimental navy bean composite with upright growth habit, and a susceptible control Red Mexican, UI 37, were evaluated using three between‐row (BR) and three within‐row (WR) spacings in presence or absence of white mold during a 2‐year period. The BR and WR spacings had no effect (P > 0. 05) on disease occurrence in the inoculated upright composite or in the viny control. Regardless of BR and WR spacings, the upright composite had less (P < 0. 01) disease than the control in both years. In general, large differences (P < 0. 05) were found between the upright composite and control spacing treatments in the presence or absence of white mold. BR spacing had a significant effect on seed yield, but WR spacing did not. In most cases, increasing plant density by reducing BR spacings resulted in higher seed yields. These findings suggest that producers may gain in seed yield without increasing risks for white mold occurrence by changing from viny to upright beans and planting in narrower rows.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Between-row and within-row spacings had no effect on white mold disease occurrence in the inoculated upright composite or in the viny control.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
BR and WR spacingse1
Interactor
Sclerotinia sderotiorume2pathogen
Outcome
disease occurrencee1
Direction
had no effecte1
Qualifier
inoculated upright compositee1
Comparator
viny controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“commercial dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“The BR and WR spacings had no effect (P > 0. 05) on disease occurrence in the inoculated upright composite or in the viny control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–988 · show in text ↑
e2

“outbreaks of white mold caused by Sclerotinia sderotiorum (Lib.) de Bary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The upright composite had less white mold disease than the control in both years, regardless of spacing.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Material
upright compositee1
Treatment
BR and WR spacingse1
Interactor
Sclerotinia sderotiorume2pathogen
Outcome
diseasee1
Direction
lesse1
Qualifier
Regardless of BR and WR spacingse1
Comparator
the controle1
Setting
both yearse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“commercial dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regardless of BR and WR spacings, the upright composite had less (P < 0. 01) disease than the control in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1105 · show in text ↑
e2

“outbreaks of white mold caused by Sclerotinia sderotiorum (Lib.) de Bary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Large differences were found between the upright composite and the control spacing treatments with or without white mold.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Material
upright compositee1
Treatment
presence or absence of white molde1
Interactor
Sclerotinia sderotiorume2pathogen
Comparator
control spacing treatmentse1

Not reportedOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“commercial dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“In general, large differences (P < 0. 05) were found between the upright composite and control spacing treatments in the presence or absence of white mold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1261 · show in text ↑
e2

“outbreaks of white mold caused by Sclerotinia sderotiorum (Lib.) de Bary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BR spacing had a significant effect on seed yield.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
BR spacinge1
Outcome
seed yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“commercial dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“BR spacing had a significant effect on seed yield, but WR spacing did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WR spacing had no significant effect on seed yield.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
WR spacinge1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“commercial dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“BR spacing had a significant effect on seed yield, but WR spacing did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing BR spacing to increase plant density resulted in higher seed yields in most cases.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
reducing BR spacingse1
Outcome
seed yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
In most casese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“commercial dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“In most cases, increasing plant density by reducing BR spacings resulted in higher seed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1432 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Producers may gain seed yield without increasing white mold risk by changing from viny to upright beans and planting in narrower rows.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
changing from viny to upright beanse1
Outcome
seed yield without increasing risks for white mold occurrencee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“commercial dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“These findings suggest that producers may gain in seed yield without increasing risks for white mold occurrence by changing from viny to upright beans and planting in narrower rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1614 · show in text ↑

brassinolide · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

density · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 58 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.