Paper · 2013 · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology)

Seasonality of nitrogen uptake, apparent recovery of fertilizer nitrogen and background nitrogen supply in two Irish grassland soils

Paul Murphy; Kay O'Connell; Suzanne L. Watson; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Improving fertilizer nitrogen (N) use efficiency is central to sustainable and profitable grassland agriculture. A plot experiment with a control and fertilizer N (calcium ammonium nitrate, 25–50 kg/ha N) applied on nine occasions from February to September 2002 was conducted at two sites in southwest Ireland to assess N uptake and apparent recovery of fertilizer N (ARFN). Apparent recovery of fertilizer N after eight weeks varied from low in February (21%) and March (46%) to high from April to August (69–98%), indicating that high N use efficiency can be achieved in Irish grasslands at these times. Low recovery in spring suggested that N was applied in excess of immediate crop requirements. Note that N uptake and ARFN values from this study are likely to be somewhat conservative, particularly for spring applications. Over the 8 weeks during which growth was monitored, most (70%) of the grass yield and N uptake response to fertilizer N were in weeks 1 to 4 after application; however, a significant (30%) response occurred in weeks 5–8. This suggested that residual N availability following grazing at 4 weeks can be significant and that there may be scope to decrease N application rates in a grazing rotation. This can potentially improve N use efficiency and decrease N surpluses, with associated economic and environmental benefits. Apparent recovery of fertilizer N was closely related to soil temperature, with a 5.8% increase in ARFN with a 1 °C increase in temperature. Background (non-fertilizer) N supply contributed an average of 164 kg/ha per year (49%) taken up by the fertilized sward, highlighting the potential importance of soil N mineralisation to grassland productivity. Note that these results are for one year at two sites and that conditions may vary between years and at other sites and also that the experiment did not reproduce the cumulative effect of repeated fertilizer application over the grazing year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent recovery of fertilizer N after eight weeks was low for February applications (21%).

Taxon
grasslandt0
Outcome
Apparent recovery of fertilizer Ne1
Direction
lowe1
Value
21%e1

Verbatim

t0

“grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apparent recovery of fertilizer N after eight weeks varied from low in February (21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–461 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent recovery of fertilizer N after eight weeks was low for March applications (46%).

Taxon
grasslandt0
Outcome
Apparent recovery of fertilizer Ne1
Direction
lowe1
Value
46%e1

Verbatim

t0

“grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apparent recovery of fertilizer N after eight weeks varied from low in February (21%) and March (46%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–477 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent recovery of fertilizer N after eight weeks was high for applications from April to August (69-98%), indicating high N use efficiency can be achieved in Irish grasslands then.

Taxon
grasslandt0
Outcome
Apparent recovery of fertilizer Ne1
Direction
highe1
Value
69–98%e1

Verbatim

t0

“grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apparent recovery of fertilizer N after eight weeks varied from low in February (21%) and March (46%) to high from April to August (69–98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–515 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low recovery in spring suggested that N was applied in excess of immediate crop requirements.

Taxon
grasslandt0
Treatment
N was applied in excess of immediate crop requirementse1
Outcome
Low recovery in springe1

Verbatim

t0

“grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Low recovery in spring suggested that N was applied in excess of immediate crop requirements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–699 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most (70%) of the grass yield and N uptake response to fertilizer N occurred in weeks 1 to 4 after application.

Taxon
grasslandt0
Outcome
grass yield and N uptake response to fertilizer Ne1
Value
70%e1
Qualifier
weeks 1 to 4 after applicatione1

Verbatim

t0

“grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“most (70%) of the grass yield and N uptake response to fertilizer N were in weeks 1 to 4 after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–988 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A significant (30%) response of grass yield and N uptake to fertilizer N occurred in weeks 5-8.

Taxon
grasslandt0
Outcome
responsee1
Value
30%e1
Qualifier
weeks 5–8e1

Verbatim

t0

“grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant (30%) response occurred in weeks 5–8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1049 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

There may be scope to decrease N application rates in a grazing rotation.

Taxon
grasslandt0
Outcome
decrease N application ratese1

Verbatim

t0

“grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“there may be scope to decrease N application rates in a grazing rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1224 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent recovery of fertilizer N was closely related to soil temperature, increasing by 5.8% per 1 °C increase in temperature.

Taxon
grasslandt0
Treatment
1 °C increase in temperaturee1
Outcome
Apparent recovery of fertilizer Ne1
Direction
increasee1
Value
5.8%e1

Verbatim

t0

“grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apparent recovery of fertilizer N was closely related to soil temperature, with a 5.8% increase in ARFN with a 1 °C increase in temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1490 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Background (non-fertilizer) N supply contributed an average of 164 kg/ha per year (49%) of the N taken up by the fertilized sward.

Taxon
grasslandt0
Outcome
Background (non-fertilizer) N supplye1
Value
164 kg/ha per year (49%)e1

Verbatim

t0

“grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Background (non-fertilizer) N supply contributed an average of 164 kg/ha per year (49%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1579 · show in text ↑