Paper · 1997 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Al-Induced, 51-Kilodalton, Membrane-Bound Proteins Are Associated with Resistance to Al in a Segregating Population of Wheat

G. J. Taylor; A. Basu; U. Basu; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Incorporation of 35S into protein is reduced by exposure to Al in wheat (Triticum aestivum), but the effects are genotype-specific. Exposure to 10 to 75 [mu]M Al had little effect on 35S incorporation into total protein, nuclear and mitochondrial protein, microsomal protein, and cytosolic protein in the Al-resistant cultivar PT741. In contrast, 10 [mu]M Al reduced incorporation by 21 to 38% in the Al-sensitive cultivar Katepwa, with effects becoming more pronounced (31-62%) as concentrations of Al increased. We previously reported that a pair of 51-kD membrane-bound proteins accumulated in root tips of PT741 under conditions of Al stress. We now report that the 51-kD band is labeled with 35S after 24 h of exposure to 75 [mu]M Al. The specific induction of the 51-kD band in PT741 suggested a potential role of one or both of these proteins in mediating resistance to Al. Therefore, we analyzed their expression in single plants from an F2 population arising from a cross between the PT741 and Katepwa cultivars. Accumulation of 1,3-[beta]-glucans (callose) in root tips after 24 h of exposure to 100 [mu]M Al indicated that this population segregated for Al resistance in about a 3:1 ratio. A close correlation between resistance to Al (low callose content of root tips) and accumulation of the 51-kD band was observed, indicating that at least one of these proteins cosegregates with the Al-resistance phenotype. As a first step in identifying a possible function, we have demonstrated that the 51-kD band is most clearly associated with the tonoplast. Whereas Al has been reported to stimulate the activity of the tonoplast H+-ATPase and H+-PPase, antibodies raised against these proteins did not cross-react with the 51-kD band. Efforts are now under way to purify this protein from tonoplast-enriched fractions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium at 10 micromolar reduced protein labelling by 21 to 38 per cent in the Al-sensitive wheat cultivar Katepwa.

Material
Katepwae1
Treatment
10 [mu]M Ale1
Outcome
incorporatione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
21 to 38%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“10 [mu]M Al reduced incorporation by 21 to 38% in the Al-sensitive cultivar Katepwa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“in a Segregating Population of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure to 10 to 75 micromolar Al had little effect on protein labelling in the Al-resistant wheat cultivar PT741.

Material
PT741e1
Treatment
10 to 75 [mu]M Ale1
Outcome
35S incorporation into total protein, nuclear and mitochondrial protein, microsomal protein, and cytosolic proteine1
Direction
little effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Exposure to 10 to 75 [mu]M Al had little effect on 35S incorporation into total protein, nuclear and mitochondrial protein, microsomal protein, and cytosolic protein in the Al-resistant cultivar PT741”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–332 · show in text ↑
t0

“in a Segregating Population of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 51-kD band was labelled with 35S after 24 h exposure to 75 micromolar Al in wheat.

Treatment
75 [mu]M Ale1
Outcome
labeled with 35Se1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the 51-kD band is labeled with 35S after 24 h of exposure to 75 [mu]M Al”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“in a Segregating Population of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–124 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulation of the 51-kD band was closely correlated with Al resistance (low callose) in the F2 population.

Material
F2 populatione2
Outcome
accumulation of the 51-kD bande1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A close correlation between resistance to Al (low callose content of root tips) and accumulation of the 51-kD band was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1328 · show in text ↑
e2

“we analyzed their expression in single plants from an F2 population arising from a cross between the PT741 and Katepwa cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“in a Segregating Population of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The F2 population segregated for Al resistance in about a 3:1 ratio.

Outcome
segregated for Al resistancee1
Value
about a 3:1 ratioe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“this population segregated for Al resistance in about a 3:1 ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“in a Segregating Population of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 51-kD band is most clearly associated with the tonoplast.

Gene
51-kD bande1
Outcome
most clearly associated with the tonoplaste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the 51-kD band is most clearly associated with the tonoplast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“in a Segregating Population of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antibodies against the tonoplast H+-ATPase and H+-PPase did not cross-react with the 51-kD band.

Gene
H+-ATPase and H+-PPasee2
Outcome
cross-react with the 51-kD bande1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“antibodies raised against these proteins did not cross-react with the 51-kD band”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1740 · show in text ↑
e2

“Whereas Al has been reported to stimulate the activity of the tonoplast H+-ATPase and H+-PPase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“in a Segregating Population of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–124 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.