Paper · 2012 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Influence of atmospheric vapour pressure deficit on ozone responses of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes

E. L. Fiscus; F. L. Booker; W. Sadok; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Environmental conditions influence plant responses to ozone (O(3)), but few studies have evaluated individual factors directly. In this study, the effect of O(3) at high and low atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (VPD) was evaluated in two genotypes of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (R123 and S156) used as O(3) bioindicator plants. Plants were grown in outdoor controlled-environment chambers in charcoal-filtered air containing 0 or 60 nl l(-1) O(3) (12 h average) at two VPDs (1.26 and 1.96 kPa) and sampled for biomass, leaf area, daily water loss, and seed yield. VPD clearly influenced O(3) effects. At low VPD, O(3) reduced biomass, leaf area, and seed yield substantially in both genotypes, while at high VPD, O(3) had no significant effect on these components. In clean air, high VPD reduced biomass and yield by similar fractions in both genotypes compared with low VPD. Data suggest that a stomatal response to VPD per se may be lacking in both genotypes and it is hypothesized that the high VPD resulted in unsustainable transpiration and water deficits that resulted in reduced growth and yield. High VPD- and water-stress-induced stomatal responses may have reduced the O(3) flux into the leaves, which contributed to a higher yield compared to the low VPD treatment in both genotypes. At low VPD, transpiration increased in the O(3) treatment relative to the clean air treatment, suggesting that whole-plant conductance was increased by O(3) exposure. Ozone-related biomass reductions at low VPD were proportionally higher in S156 than in R123, indicating that differential O(3) sensitivity of these bioindicator plants remained evident when environmental conditions were conducive for O(3) effects. Assessments of potential O(3) impacts on vegetation should incorporate interacting factors such as VPD.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low VPD, ozone reduced biomass, leaf area and seed yield substantially in both snap bean genotypes.

Taxon
snap beane0
Material
R123 and S156e0
Treatment
O(3)e1
Outcome
biomass, leaf area, and seed yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
At low VPDe1
Comparator
charcoal-filtered aire2
Setting
outdoor controlled-environment chamberse2

Verbatim

e0

“two genotypes of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (R123 and S156)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–303 · show in text ↑
e1

“At low VPD, O(3) reduced biomass, leaf area, and seed yield substantially in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–702 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants were grown in outdoor controlled-environment chambers in charcoal-filtered air containing 0 or 60 nl l(-1) O(3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At high VPD, ozone had no significant effect on biomass, leaf area and seed yield.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
O(3)e3
Outcome
biomass, leaf area, and seed yielde1e3
Direction
no significant effecte3
Qualifier
at high VPDe3
Comparator
charcoal-filtered aire2

Verbatim

e0

“two genotypes of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (R123 and S156)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–303 · show in text ↑
e1

“At low VPD, O(3) reduced biomass, leaf area, and seed yield substantially in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–702 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants were grown in outdoor controlled-environment chambers in charcoal-filtered air containing 0 or 60 nl l(-1) O(3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–456 · show in text ↑
e3

“while at high VPD, O(3) had no significant effect on these components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In clean air, high VPD reduced biomass and yield in both snap bean genotypes compared with low VPD.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
high VPDe4
Outcome
biomass and yielde4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
in clean aire4
Comparator
low VPDe4

Verbatim

e0

“two genotypes of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (R123 and S156)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–303 · show in text ↑
e4

“In clean air, high VPD reduced biomass and yield by similar fractions in both genotypes compared with low VPD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–884 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High VPD is hypothesized to reduce snap bean growth and yield through unsustainable transpiration and water deficits.

Taxon
snap beane0
Outcome
growth and yielde5
Qualifier
unsustainable transpiration and water deficitse5

Verbatim

e0

“two genotypes of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (R123 and S156)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–303 · show in text ↑
e5

“it is hypothesized that the high VPD resulted in unsustainable transpiration and water deficits that resulted in reduced growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low VPD, ozone increased transpiration relative to clean air in snap bean.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
O(3)e6
Outcome
transpiratione6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
At low VPDe6
Comparator
clean aire6

Verbatim

e0

“two genotypes of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (R123 and S156)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–303 · show in text ↑
e6

“At low VPD, transpiration increased in the O(3) treatment relative to the clean air treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1398 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone-related biomass reductions at low VPD were proportionally higher in genotype S156 than in R123.

Taxon
snap beane0
Material
S156e7
Outcome
biomass reductionse7
Direction
highere7
Qualifier
proportionallye7
Comparator
R123e7

Verbatim

e0

“two genotypes of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (R123 and S156)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–303 · show in text ↑
e7

“Ozone-related biomass reductions at low VPD were proportionally higher in S156 than in R123”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1563 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Assessments of potential ozone impacts on vegetation should incorporate interacting factors such as VPD.

Taxon
snap beant0
Outcome
potential O(3) impacts on vegetatione7

Verbatim

t0

“ozone responses of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–114 · show in text ↑
e7

“Assessments of potential O(3) impacts on vegetation should incorporate interacting factors such as VPD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1822 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

ozone · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

12 papers: 0 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

humidity · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.