Paper · 2011 · Rice

Rice Genotypes with SUB1 QTL Differ in Submergence Tolerance, Elongation Ability during Submergence and Re-generation Growth at Re-emergence

Ramani Kumar Sarkar; Bijoya Bhattacharjee

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
114
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Submergence tolerance is an important trait where short term flash flooding damages rice. Tolerant landraces that withstand submergence for 1–2 weeks were identified. Due to the heterogeneity in flood-prone ecosystem many different types of traditional rice cultivars are being grown by the farmers. The local landraces adapted to extremes in water availability could be the sources of genetic variation are to be used to improve the adaptability of rice to excess water stress. Greater genotypic variability was observed for plant height, elongation and survival %, absolute growth rate, non-structural carbohydrate retention capacity, chlorophyll content, different chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (FPs) characteristics, and re-generation growth at re-emergence. Twenty days submergence caused greater damage even in Submergence 1 ( SUB1) introgressed cultivars compared to the 14 days of submergence. The FPs, carbohydrate content and dry weight at the end of submergence showed positive and highly significant association with re-generation growth. The presence of SUB1 associated primers, either SC3 or ART5, was noticed even in greater elongating types of rice genotypes. These genotypes possess one or more of the adaptive traits required for the flood-prone ecosystem, which range from temporary submergence of 1–2 weeks to long period of stagnant water tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant rice landraces that withstand submergence for 1-2 weeks were identified.

Material
landracese1
Treatment
submergence for 1–2 weekse1
Outcome
Tolerant landracese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Genotypes with SUB1 QTL Differ in Submergence Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tolerant landraces that withstand submergence for 1–2 weeks were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–165 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes showed greater variability in plant height, elongation and survival percentage.

Outcome
plant height, elongation and survival %e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Genotypes with SUB1 QTL Differ in Submergence Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e2

“Greater genotypic variability was observed for plant height, elongation and survival %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–565 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes showed greater variability in absolute growth rate, non-structural carbohydrate retention capacity and chlorophyll content.

Outcome
absolute growth rate, non-structural carbohydrate retention capacity, chlorophyll contente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Genotypes with SUB1 QTL Differ in Submergence Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e7

“absolute growth rate, non-structural carbohydrate retention capacity, chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes showed greater variability in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and in re-generation growth at re-emergence.

Outcome
different chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (FPs) characteristics, and re-generation growth at re-emergencee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Genotypes with SUB1 QTL Differ in Submergence Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e7

“different chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (FPs) characteristics, and re-generation growth at re-emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty days of submergence caused greater damage than 14 days of submergence even in SUB1 introgressed cultivars.

Material
Submergence 1 ( SUB1) introgressed cultivarse3
Treatment
Twenty days submergencee3
Gene
SUB1e3
Outcome
damagee3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
14 days of submergencee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Genotypes with SUB1 QTL Differ in Submergence Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e3

“Twenty days submergence caused greater damage even in Submergence 1 ( SUB1) introgressed cultivars compared to the 14 days of submergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–906 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The FPs, carbohydrate content and dry weight at the end of submergence were positively and highly significantly associated with re-generation growth.

Organ / stage
at the end of submergencee4
Outcome
re-generation growthe4
Direction
positivee4
Qualifier
highly significante4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Genotypes with SUB1 QTL Differ in Submergence Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e4

“The FPs, carbohydrate content and dry weight at the end of submergence showed positive and highly significant association with re-generation growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1055 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SUB1 associated primers were detected even in greater elongating types of rice genotypes.

Material
greater elongating types of rice genotypese5
Gene
SUB1e5
Outcome
presence of SUB1 associated primerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Genotypes with SUB1 QTL Differ in Submergence Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e5

“The presence of SUB1 associated primers, either SC3 or ART5, was noticed even in greater elongating types of rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1180 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The genotypes possess adaptive traits required for the flood-prone ecosystem, ranging from temporary submergence of 1-2 weeks to long periods of stagnant water tolerance.

Outcome
adaptive traits required for the flood-prone ecosysteme6
Qualifier
range from temporary submergence of 1–2 weeks to long period of stagnant water tolerancee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Genotypes with SUB1 QTL Differ in Submergence Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e6

“These genotypes possess one or more of the adaptive traits required for the flood-prone ecosystem, which range from temporary submergence of 1–2 weeks to long period of stagnant water tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1375 · show in text ↑

flooding · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 7 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.