Paper · 2014 · Agronomy Journal

Age of No‐Till System and Nitrogen Management on Common Bean Nutrition and Yield

Rogério P. Soratto; Adelson A. G. Perez; Adalton M. Fernandes

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the no‐till (NT) system, N availability may change depending on the number of years since NT was adopted. Thus, an experiment was conducted in a Typic Rhodudalf in Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil, to evaluate the influence of the age (timing of establishment) of the NT system and N fertilizer management on the nutrition, yield, and N‐use efficiency (NUE) of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop. Treatments included four management systems (a newly implemented NT system, an established NT system, a newly implemented NT with an application of 60 kg ha −1 N at pre‐sowing, and an established NT with an application of 60 kg ha −1 N at pre‐sowing) and four N rates (0, 30, 60, and 120 kg ha −1 ) sidedressed at the V 4 stage of common bean. The age of the NT system did not affect common bean nutrition or its response to sidedressed N application, but the established NT system, regardless of N application at pre‐sowing, provided a slightly greater common bean yield. In both the newly implemented and established NT systems, N fertilization increased the aboveground biomass, seed yield, and protein concentration in seeds. Even with the application of N at pre‐sowing, seed yield increased in response to sidedressed N fertilization in all the management systems. The NUE by common bean was greater in treatments receiving N at pre‐sowing. A higher seed yield and NUE of common bean grown in the NT systems after grass was achieved with the combined application of N at pre‐sowing and sidedressing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till age did not affect common bean nutrition or response to sidedressed nitrogen.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
age of the NT systeme0
Outcome
common bean nutrition or its response to sidedressed N applicatione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The age of the NT system did not affect common bean nutrition or its response to sidedressed N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Established no-till provided slightly greater bean yield regardless of presowing nitrogen.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
established NT systeme0
Outcome
common bean yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
regardless of N application at pre‐sowinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the established NT system, regardless of N application at pre‐sowing, provided a slightly greater common bean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased aboveground biomass and seed yield in both no-till systems.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
aboveground biomass, seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both the newly implemented and established NT systemse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both the newly implemented and established NT systems, N fertilization increased the aboveground biomass, seed yield, and protein concentration in seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased seed protein concentration in both no-till systems.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
protein concentration in seedse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both the newly implemented and established NT systems, N fertilization increased the aboveground biomass, seed yield, and protein concentration in seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sidedressed nitrogen increased seed yield in all management systems even with presowing nitrogen.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
sidedressed N fertilizatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Even with the application of N at pre‐sowinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even with the application of N at pre‐sowing, seed yield increased in response to sidedressed N fertilization in all the management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1271 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presowing nitrogen increased common bean nitrogen-use efficiency.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
N at pre‐sowinge0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NUE by common bean was greater in treatments receiving N at pre‐sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining presowing and sidedressed nitrogen produced higher seed yield and nitrogen-use efficiency after grass.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
combined application of N at pre‐sowing and sidedressinge0
Outcome
seed yield and NUEe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
NT systems after grasse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher seed yield and NUE of common bean grown in the NT systems after grass was achieved with the combined application of N at pre‐sowing and sidedressing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1506 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

tillage · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 41 positive, 23 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.