Paper · 1992 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Evaluation of paclobutrazol on growth, flowering and yield of mango cv. Kensington Pride

EC Winston

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
42
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The growth retardant paclobutrazol was applied after harvest as a foliar spray, a band along the drip line, or a collar drench in trials over 3 years on 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old trees of mango cv. Kensington Pride. The trees were assessed for percentage of branches with vegetative flush, flush length, flowering, and yield. Paclobutrazol reduced length of vegetative growth in all trials. Eight mL a.i. per tree, applied as a single yearly collar drench, significantly (P<0.05) reduced percentage flush. Collar treatments were significantly (P<0.05) more effective than drip line treatment in reducing length of vegetative growth. Two years' collar drench was generally more effective than a band treatment followed by a collar drench. In particular, collar drenches of 4 and 8 mL a.i./tree, applied for 2 consecutive years, reduced summer growth. Flowering and cropping were significantly (P<0.05) increased by paclobutrazol in a year of inadequate winter stress, while a trend towards increased yield was noted under more normal conditions. Yield increases were due to fruit numbers rather than size. Fruit colour was unaffected. Soil-applied treatments were more effective on flowering and cropping than foliar treatment, with collar drenches more effective than drip line treatment. A trend for decreasing yields was found when paclobutrazol was applied as a collar drench for 2 consecutive years at the same rate, compared with an ineffective drip line followed by a single collar treatment. Rates of paclobutrazol >4 mL a.i./tree caused unacceptable compaction of flower panicles. Four mL a.i./tree appeared the best application rate given the prevailing soil type, climatic conditions, and tree size and age.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol reduced length of vegetative growth in all trials.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Paclobutrazole0
Outcome
length of vegetative growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paclobutrazol reduced length of vegetative growth in all trials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–387 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight mL a.i. per tree, applied as a single yearly collar drench, significantly (P<0.05) reduced percentage flush.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Eight mL a.i. per tree, applied as a single yearly collar drenche0
Outcome
percentage flushe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eight mL a.i. per tree, applied as a single yearly collar drench, significantly (P<0.05) reduced percentage flush.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Collar treatments were significantly (P<0.05) more effective than drip line treatment in reducing length of vegetative growth.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Collar treatmentse0
Outcome
length of vegetative growthe0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
drip line treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Collar treatments were significantly (P<0.05) more effective than drip line treatment in reducing length of vegetative growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two years' collar drench was generally more effective than a band treatment followed by a collar drench.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Two years' collar drenche0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
a band treatment followed by a collar drenche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two years' collar drench was generally more effective than a band treatment followed by a collar drench.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

collar drenches of 4 and 8 mL a.i./tree, applied for 2 consecutive years, reduced summer growth.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Treatment
collar drenches of 4 and 8 mL a.i./tree, applied for 2 consecutive yearse0
Outcome
summer growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“collar drenches of 4 and 8 mL a.i./tree, applied for 2 consecutive years, reduced summer growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol increased flowering in a year of inadequate winter stress.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Treatment
paclobutrazole0
Outcome
Floweringe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a year of inadequate winter stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering and cropping were significantly (P<0.05) increased by paclobutrazol in a year of inadequate winter stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol increased cropping in a year of inadequate winter stress.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Treatment
paclobutrazole0
Outcome
croppinge0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a year of inadequate winter stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering and cropping were significantly (P<0.05) increased by paclobutrazol in a year of inadequate winter stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

a trend towards increased yield was noted under more normal conditions.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a trend towards increased yield was noted under more normal conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol yield increases came from fruit number rather than size.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Outcome
fruit numbers rather than sizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increases were due to fruit numbers rather than size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit colour was unaffected.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Outcome
Fruit coloure0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit colour was unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied treatments were more effective on flowering and cropping than foliar treatment

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Soil-applied treatmentse0
Outcome
flowering and croppinge0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
foliar treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil-applied treatments were more effective on flowering and cropping than foliar treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

collar drenches more effective than drip line treatment.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Treatment
collar drenchese0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
drip line treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“collar drenches more effective than drip line treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A trend for decreasing yields was found when paclobutrazol was applied as a collar drench for 2 consecutive years at the same rate, compared with an ineffective drip line followed by a single collar treatment.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Treatment
paclobutrazol was applied as a collar drench for 2 consecutive years at the same ratee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasinge0
Comparator
an ineffective drip line followed by a single collar treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A trend for decreasing yields was found when paclobutrazol was applied as a collar drench for 2 consecutive years at the same rate, compared with an ineffective drip line followed by a single collar treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rates of paclobutrazol >4 mL a.i./tree caused unacceptable compaction of flower panicles.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Rates of paclobutrazol >4 mL a.i./treee0
Outcome
compaction of flower paniclese0
Direction
unacceptablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rates of paclobutrazol >4 mL a.i./tree caused unacceptable compaction of flower panicles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors judged 4 mL a.i./tree the best application rate under the studied soil, climate, tree size and age.

Taxon
mango cv. Kensington PrideMangifera indicat0
Outcome
Four mL a.i./treee0
Qualifier
given the prevailing soil type, climatic conditions, and tree size and agee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four mL a.i./tree appeared the best application rate given the prevailing soil type, climatic conditions, and tree size and age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1713 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Kensington Pride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–88 · show in text ↑

paclobutrazol · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

paclobutrazol · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

paclobutrazol · phenology · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.