Paper · 2008 · ˜The œIndian Journal of Crop Science/˜The œIndian journal of crop science

Effect of tillage and mulching management on the crop productivity and soil properties in maize-wheat rotation

Peeyush Sharma; Vikas Abrol; G.R. Maurthi Shankar

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2005–2007 and 2006–2007 at Dryland Research Sub Station, Dhiansar to study the influence of tillage and mulching management on soil physical and chemical properties and crop yield on maize - wheat system under rainfed situations. Maize and wheat yield was statistically at par in conventional and minimum tillage and significantly higher over control. Increased in bulk density was higher in conventional tillage as compared to the minimum tillage. Reduction in infiltration rate was 17.24% higher in conventional tillage than minimum tillage. Minimum tillage improves the net return, benefit: cost ratio as well as fertility status. Application of plastic mulch resulted in maximum grain yield, infiltration rate and nutrient status than no mulch.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize and wheat yields under conventional and minimum tillage were statistically at par and above control.

Taxon
Maize and wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Treatment
conventional and minimum tillagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize and wheat yield was statistically at par in conventional and minimum tillage and significantly higher over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk density increased more under conventional than minimum tillage.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“Increased in bulk density was higher in conventional tillage as compared to the minimum tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infiltration rate reduction was 17.24% greater under conventional than minimum tillage.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
infiltration ratee0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
17.24%e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in infiltration rate was 17.24% higher in conventional tillage than minimum tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage improved net return and benefit: cost ratio.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Treatment
Minimum tillagee0
Outcome
net return, benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum tillage improves the net return, benefit: cost ratio as well as fertility status.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage improved fertility status.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Treatment
Minimum tillagee0
Outcome
fertility statuse0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum tillage improves the net return, benefit: cost ratio as well as fertility status.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch gave maximum grain yield relative to no mulch.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
no mulche0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of plastic mulch resulted in maximum grain yield, infiltration rate and nutrient status than no mulch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch gave maximum infiltration rate and nutrient status relative to no mulch.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
infiltration rate and nutrient statuse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
no mulche0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of plastic mulch resulted in maximum grain yield, infiltration rate and nutrient status than no mulch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–110 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.