Paper · 2006 · Plant Soil and Environment

Paranodules and colonization of wheat roots by phytohormone producing bacteria in soil

N. Narula; A. Deubel; W. Gans; et al.

16
claims
26
verbatim quotes
64
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Soil bacteria belonging to the genus Azotobacter, Pantoea and some unidentified soil isolates were tested in vitro for phytohormone production under laboratory and soil conditions. The German wheat variety Munk was inoculated by several soil bacteria with exogenously applied hormones (IAA, 2,4-D) and a flavonoid(naringenin) with a half of the amount of recommended doses of fertilizers under greenhouse conditions. Most of the soil bacteria tested were able to produce indole acetic acid (IAA), and stimulated a lateral root development and colonization by the addition of 2,4-D and IAA. A formation of paranodules on roots as a result of crack entry invasion was observed with 2,4-D as well as with IAA. We were able to reisolate the organism from the paranodules and could establish the same results. Analyses for root exudates and in vitro phytohormone production by various bacterial isolates were also carried out, revealing that 2,4-D can be replaced either by high IAA producing bacteria or by exogenous application of IAA. Bacterial survival in the rhizosphere as well as the root and shoot weight of wheat plants were positively affected also by the addition of IAA, 2,4-D and naringenin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most tested soil bacteria produced IAA.

Interactor
soil bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
soil bacteria tested were able to produce indole acetic acid (IAA)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the soil bacteria tested were able to produce indole acetic acid (IAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D stimulated lateral root development.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
lateral root developmente0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stimulated a lateral root development and colonization by the addition of 2,4-D and IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paranodules and colonization of wheat roots by phytohormone producing bacteria in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D stimulated colonization.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
colonizatione0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stimulated a lateral root development and colonization by the addition of 2,4-D and IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paranodules and colonization of wheat roots by phytohormone producing bacteria in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA stimulated lateral root development.

Treatment
IAAe0
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
lateral root developmente0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stimulated a lateral root development and colonization by the addition of 2,4-D and IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paranodules and colonization of wheat roots by phytohormone producing bacteria in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA stimulated colonization.

Treatment
IAAe0
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
colonizatione0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stimulated a lateral root development and colonization by the addition of 2,4-D and IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paranodules and colonization of wheat roots by phytohormone producing bacteria in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D led to paranodule formation on roots.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
formation of paranodules on rootse0
Qualifier
crack entry invasione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A formation of paranodules on roots as a result of crack entry invasion was observed with 2,4-D as well as with IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA led to paranodule formation on roots.

Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
formation of paranodules on rootse0
Qualifier
crack entry invasione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A formation of paranodules on roots as a result of crack entry invasion was observed with 2,4-D as well as with IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The organism was reisolated from paranodules.

Organ / stage
paranodulese0
Outcome
reisolate the organism from the paranodulese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We were able to reisolate the organism from the paranodules and could establish the same results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

high IAA producing bacteria could replace 2,4-D.

Treatment
high IAA producing bacteriae0
Outcome
2,4-D can be replacede0
Comparator
2,4-De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2,4-D can be replaced either by high IAA producing bacteria or by exogenous application of IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

exogenous application of IAA could replace 2,4-D.

Treatment
exogenous application of IAAe0
Outcome
2,4-D can be replacede0
Comparator
2,4-De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2,4-D can be replaced either by high IAA producing bacteria or by exogenous application of IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA positively affected Bacterial survival in the rhizosphere.

Treatment
IAAe0
Interactor
Bacteriale0symbiont
Outcome
Bacterial survival in the rhizospheree0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial survival in the rhizosphere as well as the root and shoot weight of wheat plants were positively affected also by the addition of IAA, 2,4-D and naringenin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA positively affected root and shoot weight of wheat plants.

Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
root and shoot weight of wheat plantse0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial survival in the rhizosphere as well as the root and shoot weight of wheat plants were positively affected also by the addition of IAA, 2,4-D and naringenin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D positively affected Bacterial survival in the rhizosphere.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
Bacteriale0symbiont
Outcome
Bacterial survival in the rhizospheree0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial survival in the rhizosphere as well as the root and shoot weight of wheat plants were positively affected also by the addition of IAA, 2,4-D and naringenin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D positively affected root and shoot weight of wheat plants.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
root and shoot weight of wheat plantse0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial survival in the rhizosphere as well as the root and shoot weight of wheat plants were positively affected also by the addition of IAA, 2,4-D and naringenin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

naringenin positively affected Bacterial survival in the rhizosphere.

Treatment
naringenine0
Interactor
Bacteriale0symbiont
Outcome
Bacterial survival in the rhizospheree0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial survival in the rhizosphere as well as the root and shoot weight of wheat plants were positively affected also by the addition of IAA, 2,4-D and naringenin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

naringenin positively affected root and shoot weight of wheat plants.

Treatment
naringenine0
Outcome
root and shoot weight of wheat plantse0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial survival in the rhizosphere as well as the root and shoot weight of wheat plants were positively affected also by the addition of IAA, 2,4-D and naringenin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1198 · show in text ↑

indole-3-acetic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

2,4-D · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

51 papers: 35 positive, 16 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.