Paper · 2000 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Short-term nitrogen-induced modulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in tobacco and maize leaves

E.H. Murchie

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
23
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Untransformed maize and tobacco plants and tobacco plants constitutively expressing nitrate reductase were grown with sufficient NO(3)- to support maximal growth. Four days prior to treatment the tobacco plants were deprived of nitrogen. Excised maize leaves and tobacco leaf discs were fed with either 40 mM KNO(3) or 40 mM KCl (control) in the light. Phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase (Case) activity was measured at 0.3 mM and 3 mM PEP. The light- induced increase in PEPCase V(max) was greater in maize than tobacco. Furthermore light decreased malate sensitivity in maize (which was N-replete) but not in N-deficient tobacco. NO(3)- treatment increased PEPCase V:(max) values in both species and decreased the sensitivity to inhibition by malate, but effects of NO(3)- were much more pronounced in tobacco than maize. PEPCase kinase activity was, however, greater in maize leaves NO(3)- than in the Cl(-)-treated controls, suggesting that it is responsive to leaf nitrogen supply. A correlation between foliar glutamine content and PEPCase activity was observed. It is concluded that PEPCase is sensitive to N metabolites which favour increased flow through the anapleurotic pathway in both C(3) and C(4) plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light increased PEPCase V(max) more in maize than tobacco.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
PEPCase V(max)e0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
tobaccoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The light- induced increase in PEPCase V(max) was greater in maize than tobacco.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light decreased malate sensitivity in nitrogen-replete maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
malate sensitivitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
N-repletee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light decreased malate sensitivity in maize (which was N-replete) but not in N-deficient tobacco.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light did not decrease malate sensitivity in nitrogen-deficient tobacco.

Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
malate sensitivitye0
Direction
note0
Qualifier
N-deficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light decreased malate sensitivity in maize (which was N-replete) but not in N-deficient tobacco.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate increased PEPCase V(max) in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
NO(3)- treatmente0
Outcome
PEPCase V:(max)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO(3)- treatment increased PEPCase V:(max) values in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate increased PEPCase V(max) in tobacco.

Treatment
NO(3)- treatmente0
Outcome
PEPCase V:(max)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO(3)- treatment increased PEPCase V:(max) values in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate decreased sensitivity to malate inhibition in both species, more strongly in tobacco.

Treatment
NO(3)-e0
Outcome
sensitivity to inhibition by malatee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased the sensitivity to inhibition by malate, but effects of NO(3)- were much more pronounced in tobacco than maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate-treated maize leaves had greater PEPCase kinase activity than chloride controls.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
NO(3)-e0
Outcome
PEPCase kinase activitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Cl(-)-treated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PEPCase kinase activity was, however, greater in maize leaves NO(3)- than in the Cl(-)-treated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–930 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar glutamine content correlated with PEPCase activity.

Taxon
tobacco and maizeNicotiana tabacumZea mayst0
Organ / stage
foliare0
Compound
glutaminee0
Outcome
PEPCase activitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A correlation between foliar glutamine content and PEPCase activity was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that nitrogen metabolites increase flow through the anapleurotic pathway via PEPCase sensitivity.

Taxon
C(3) and C(4) plantse0
Compound
N metabolitese0
Outcome
flow through the anapleurotic pathwaye0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“PEPCase is sensitive to N metabolites which favour increased flow through the anapleurotic pathway in both C(3) and C(4) plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1221 · show in text ↑

light · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 8 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.