Paper · 2012 · HortScience

Nitrogen Requirements and N Status Determination of Lettuce

Thomas G. Bottoms; Richard F. Smith; Michael D. Cahn; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
50
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

As concern over NO 3 -N pollution of groundwater increases, California lettuce growers are under pressure to improve nitrogen (N) fertilizer efficiency. Crop growth, N uptake, and the value of soil and plant N diagnostic measures were evaluated in 24 iceberg and romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L., and longifolia Lam., respectively) field trials from 2007 to 2010. The reliability of presidedressing soil nitrate testing (PSNT) to identify fields in which N application could be reduced or eliminated was evaluated in 16 non-replicated strip trials and five replicated trials on commercial farms. All commercial field sites had greater than 20 mg·kg −1 residual soil NO 3 -N at the time of the first in-season N application. In the strip trials, plots in which the cooperating growers’ initial sidedress N application was eliminated or reduced were compared with the growers’ standard N fertilization program. In the replicated trials, the growers’ N regime was compared with treatments in which one or more N fertigation through drip irrigation was eliminated. Additionally, seasonal N rates from 11 to 336 kg·ha −1 were compared in three replicated drip-irrigated research farm trials. Seasonal N application in the strip trials was reduced by an average of 77 kg·ha −1 (73 kg·ha −1 vs. 150 kg·ha −1 for the grower N regime) with no reduction in fresh biomass produced and only a slight reduction in crop N uptake (151 kg·ha −1 vs. 156 kg·ha −1 for the grower N regime). Similarly, an average seasonal N rate reduction of 88 kg·ha −1 (96 kg·ha −1 vs. 184 kg·ha −1 ) was achieved in the replicated commercial trials with no biomass reduction. Seasonal N rates between 111 and 192 kg·ha −1 maximized fresh biomass in the research farm trials, which were conducted in fields with lower residual soil NO 3 -N than the commercial trials. Across fields, lettuce N uptake was slow in the first 4 weeks after planting, averaging less than 0.5 kg·ha −1 ·d −1 . N uptake then increased linearly until harvest (≈9 weeks after planting), averaging ≈4 kg·ha −1 ·d −1 over that period. Whole plant critical N concentration (N c , the minimum whole plant N concentration required to maximize growth) was estimated by the equation N c (g·kg −1 ) = 42 − 2.8 dry mass (DM, Mg·ha −1 ); on that basis, critical N uptake (crop N uptake required to maintain whole plant N above N c ) in the commercial fields averaged 116 kg·ha −1 compared with the mean uptake of 145 kg·ha −1 with the grower N regime. Soil NO 3 -N greater than 20 mg·kg −1 was a reliable indicator that N application could be reduced or delayed. Neither leaf N nor midrib NO 3 -N was correlated with concurrently measured soil NO 3 -N and therefore of limited value in directing in-season N fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting seasonal N application in strip trials by 77 kg·ha −1 caused no reduction in fresh biomass compared with the grower N regime.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Seasonal N applicatione1
Outcome
fresh biomasse1
Direction
no reductione1
Value
77 kg·ha −1e1
Comparator
grower N regimee1
Setting
field trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated in 24 iceberg and romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L., and longifolia Lam., respectively) field trials from 2007 to 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–382 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seasonal N application in the strip trials was reduced by an average of 77 kg·ha −1 (73 kg·ha −1 vs. 150 kg·ha −1 for the grower N regime) with no reduction in fresh biomass produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced seasonal N application produced only a slight reduction in crop N uptake (151 kg·ha −1) compared with the grower N regime.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Seasonal N applicatione1
Outcome
crop N uptakee2
Direction
slight reductione2
Value
151 kg·ha −1e2
Comparator
grower N regimee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated in 24 iceberg and romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L., and longifolia Lam., respectively) field trials from 2007 to 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–382 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seasonal N application in the strip trials was reduced by an average of 77 kg·ha −1 (73 kg·ha −1 vs. 150 kg·ha −1 for the grower N regime) with no reduction in fresh biomass produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1389 · show in text ↑
e2

“only a slight reduction in crop N uptake (151 kg·ha −1 vs. 156 kg·ha −1 for the grower N regime)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In replicated commercial trials, an average seasonal N rate reduction of 88 kg·ha −1 was achieved with no biomass reduction.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
seasonal N rate reductione3
Outcome
biomasse3
Direction
no biomass reductione3
Value
88 kg·ha −1e3
Setting
replicated commercial trialse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated in 24 iceberg and romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L., and longifolia Lam., respectively) field trials from 2007 to 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–382 · show in text ↑
e3

“Similarly, an average seasonal N rate reduction of 88 kg·ha −1 (96 kg·ha −1 vs. 184 kg·ha −1 ) was achieved in the replicated commercial trials with no biomass reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1661 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal N rates between 111 and 192 kg·ha −1 maximized fresh biomass in research farm trials on fields with lower residual soil NO 3 -N than the commercial trials.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Seasonal N rates between 111 and 192 kg·ha −1e4
Outcome
fresh biomasse4
Direction
maximizede4
Qualifier
lower residual soil NO 3 -N than the commercial trialse4
Setting
research farm trialse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated in 24 iceberg and romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L., and longifolia Lam., respectively) field trials from 2007 to 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–382 · show in text ↑
e4

“Seasonal N rates between 111 and 192 kg·ha −1 maximized fresh biomass in the research farm trials, which were conducted in fields with lower residual soil NO 3 -N than the commercial trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1852 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce N uptake was slow in the first 4 weeks after planting, averaging less than 0.5 kg·ha −1 ·d −1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae5
Outcome
N uptakee5
Value
less than 0.5 kg·ha −1 ·d −1e5
Qualifier
slow in the first 4 weeks after plantinge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated in 24 iceberg and romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L., and longifolia Lam., respectively) field trials from 2007 to 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–382 · show in text ↑
e5

“Across fields, lettuce N uptake was slow in the first 4 weeks after planting, averaging less than 0.5 kg·ha −1 ·d −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–1970 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce N uptake increased linearly until harvest, averaging about 4 kg·ha −1 ·d −1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae5
Outcome
N uptakee6
Direction
increased linearlye6
Value
≈4 kg·ha −1 ·d −1e6
Qualifier
until harveste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated in 24 iceberg and romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L., and longifolia Lam., respectively) field trials from 2007 to 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–382 · show in text ↑
e5

“Across fields, lettuce N uptake was slow in the first 4 weeks after planting, averaging less than 0.5 kg·ha −1 ·d −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–1970 · show in text ↑
e6

“N uptake then increased linearly until harvest (≈9 weeks after planting), averaging ≈4 kg·ha −1 ·d −1 over that period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2091 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The whole-plant critical N concentration was estimated as 42 − 2.8 times dry mass (Mg·ha −1) for lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
critical N concentratione7
Value
42 − 2.8 dry masse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated in 24 iceberg and romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L., and longifolia Lam., respectively) field trials from 2007 to 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–382 · show in text ↑
e7

“Whole plant critical N concentration (N c , the minimum whole plant N concentration required to maximize growth) was estimated by the equation N c (g·kg −1 ) = 42 − 2.8 dry mass (DM, Mg·ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2093–2286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical N uptake in commercial fields averaged 116 kg·ha −1, compared with 145 kg·ha −1 under the grower N regime.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
critical N uptakee7
Value
116 kg·ha −1e7
Qualifier
145 kg·ha −1e7
Comparator
grower N regimee7
Setting
commercial fieldse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated in 24 iceberg and romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L., and longifolia Lam., respectively) field trials from 2007 to 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–382 · show in text ↑
e7

“critical N uptake (crop N uptake required to maintain whole plant N above N c ) in the commercial fields averaged 116 kg·ha −1 compared with the mean uptake of 145 kg·ha −1 with the grower N regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2303–2500 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A soil NO 3 -N greater than 20 mg·kg −1 was a reliable indicator that N application could be reduced or delayed in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Compound
NO 3 -Ne6
Outcome
reliable indicatore6
Direction
greater thane6
Value
20 mg·kg −1e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated in 24 iceberg and romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L., and longifolia Lam., respectively) field trials from 2007 to 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–382 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soil NO 3 -N greater than 20 mg·kg −1 was a reliable indicator that N application could be reduced or delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2502–2611 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf N and midrib NO 3 -N were not correlated with concurrently measured soil NO 3 -N and have limited value for in-season N fertilization.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Organ / stage
leafe6
Outcome
correlatede6
Qualifier
of limited value in directing in-season N fertilizatione6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated in 24 iceberg and romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L., and longifolia Lam., respectively) field trials from 2007 to 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–382 · show in text ↑
e6

“Neither leaf N nor midrib NO 3 -N was correlated with concurrently measured soil NO 3 -N and therefore of limited value in directing in-season N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2613–2771 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

85 papers: 60 positive, 25 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 35 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.