Paper · 2006 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of Foliar Application of Phosphorus on Winter Wheat Grain Yield, Phosphorus Uptake, and Use Efficiency

Jagadeesh Mosali; Kefyalew Desta; Roger K. Teal; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
84
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT One would expect foliar applied phosphorus (P) to have higher use efficiencies than when applied to the soil, but limited information is available concerning this. Experiments were conducted in 2002, 2003, and 2004 to determine the effect of foliar applications of P on winter wheat grain yields, P uptake, and use efficiency. Twelve treatments containing varying foliar P rates (0, 1, 2, and 4 kg ha− 1 in 2002 and 2003 and additional 8, 12, 16, and 20 kg ha− 1 in 2004) with and without pre-plant rates of 30 kg ha− 1 were evaluated. Foliar applications of P at Feekes 7 generally increased grain yields and P uptake versus no foliar P. Use efficiency was higher when P was applied at Feekes 10.54. Results from this study suggested that low rates of foliar applied P might correct mid-season P deficiency in winter wheat, and that might result in higher P use efficiencies. Keywords: winter wheatfoliar phosphorusphosphorus use efficiencyphosphorus uptake ACKNOWLEDGMENT Contribution from the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater, OK. Notes a Rates are as presented in Table 2. All contrasts involving foliar application stages were made only at the same rate of P (i.e., 2 kg P ha−1). a Refer to Table 2 for treatment description. a Refer to Table 2 for treatment description. a Refer to Table 2 for treatment description. a Refer to Table 2 for treatment description.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar P applied at Feekes 7 increased grain yield and P uptake relative to no foliar P.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Foliar applications of P at Feekes 7e1
Outcome
grain yields and P uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
no foliar Pe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Foliar applications of P at Feekes 7 generally increased grain yields and P uptake versus no foliar P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Application of Phosphorus on Winter Wheat Grain Yield, Phosphorus Uptake, and Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P applied at Feekes 10.54 gave higher use efficiency.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
P was applied at Feekes 10.54e2
Outcome
Use efficiencye2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Use efficiency was higher when P was applied at Feekes 10.54”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Application of Phosphorus on Winter Wheat Grain Yield, Phosphorus Uptake, and Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Low rates of foliar applied P might correct mid-season P deficiency in winter wheat.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
low rates of foliar applied Pe3
Outcome
mid-season P deficiencye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Results from this study suggested that low rates of foliar applied P might correct mid-season P deficiency in winter wheat, and that might result in higher P use efficiencies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Application of Phosphorus on Winter Wheat Grain Yield, Phosphorus Uptake, and Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Low rates of foliar applied P might result in higher P use efficiency.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
low rates of foliar applied Pe3
Outcome
P use efficienciese3
Direction
highere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Results from this study suggested that low rates of foliar applied P might correct mid-season P deficiency in winter wheat, and that might result in higher P use efficiencies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Foliar Application of Phosphorus on Winter Wheat Grain Yield, Phosphorus Uptake, and Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.