Paper · 1990 · HortScience

Ethylene Evolution by Tomato Plants Receiving Nitrogen Nutrition from Urea

Allen V. Barker; Kenneth A. Corey

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Urea fertilization of `Heinz 1350' tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in sand or soil culture did not enhance ethylene evolution or restrict growth relative to plants receiving \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\mathbf{NO}_{\mathbf{3}}^{\mathbf{-}}\) \end{document} whereas \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\mathbf{NO}_{\mathbf{4}}^{\mathbf{+}}\) \end{document} nutrition doubled the relative rates of ethylene evolution and restricted relative growth. Inhibitors of N transformations in media (nitrapyrin, Np; hydroquinone, HQ; and phenylphosphorodiamidate, PPD) had no apparent stimulator effects on ethylene evolution of plants grown on urea or \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\mathbf{NO}_{\mathbf{3}}^{\mathbf{-}}\) \end{document} nutrition in sand or soil. Ethylene evolution was enhanced by PPD relative to that by Np or HQ for plants receiving \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\mathbf{NO}_{\mathbf{4}}^{\mathbf{+}}\) \end{document} nutrition. Each inhibitor had toxic effects on plant growth. Increasing K + supply from 0 to 8 m m in nutrient solutions decreased ethylene evolution and increased plant growth with urea fertilization. Urea had low phytotoxicity if its hydrolysis to \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\mathbf{NO}_{\mathbf{4}}^{\mathbf{+}}\) \end{document} was prevented in the media. Chemical names used: p-dihydroxybenzene (hydroquinone); benzenephosphorodiamide (phenylphosphorodiamidate); 2-chloro-6-(trichloromethyl)pyridine (nitrapyrin).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea did not enhance tomato ethylene evolution relative to nitrate nutrition.

Material
Heinz 1350e0
Treatment
Urea fertilizatione0
Outcome
ethylene evolutione0
Direction
did not enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Urea fertilization of `Heinz 1350' tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in sand or soil culture did not enhance ethylene evolution or restrict growth relative to plants receiving”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea did not restrict tomato growth relative to nitrate nutrition.

Material
Heinz 1350e0
Treatment
Urea fertilizatione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
did not enhance ethylene evolution or restricte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Urea fertilization of `Heinz 1350' tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in sand or soil culture did not enhance ethylene evolution or restrict growth relative to plants receiving”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition doubled relative tomato ethylene evolution.

Outcome
relative rates of ethylene evolutione0
Direction
doublede0
Value
doublede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrition doubled the relative rates of ethylene evolution and restricted relative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition restricted relative tomato growth.

Outcome
relative growthe0
Direction
restrictede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrition doubled the relative rates of ethylene evolution and restricted relative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transformation inhibitors did not stimulate ethylene evolution under urea or nitrate nutrition.

Treatment
Inhibitors of N transformations in mediae0
Outcome
ethylene evolutione0
Direction
no apparent stimulator effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inhibitors of N transformations in media (nitrapyrin, Np; hydroquinone, HQ; and phenylphosphorodiamidate, PPD) had no apparent stimulator effects on ethylene evolution of plants grown on urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPD enhanced ethylene evolution compared with Np or HQ during ammonium nutrition.

Treatment
PPDe0
Outcome
Ethylene evolutione0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
Np or HQe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethylene evolution was enhanced by PPD relative to that by Np or HQ for plants receiving”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each nitrogen transformation inhibitor had toxic effects on tomato growth.

Treatment
Each inhibitore0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
toxic effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Each inhibitor had toxic effects on plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium from 0 to 8 m m decreased ethylene evolution under urea fertilization.

Treatment
Increasing K + supply from 0 to 8 m me0
Outcome
ethylene evolutione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing K + supply from 0 to 8 m m in nutrient solutions decreased ethylene evolution and increased plant growth with urea fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium from 0 to 8 m m increased tomato growth under urea fertilization.

Treatment
Increasing K + supply from 0 to 8 m me0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing K + supply from 0 to 8 m m in nutrient solutions decreased ethylene evolution and increased plant growth with urea fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea had low phytotoxicity when its hydrolysis in the medium was prevented.

Outcome
low phytotoxicitye0
Qualifier
was prevented in the mediae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Urea had low phytotoxicity if its hydrolysis to”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1696 · show in text ↑
e1

“was prevented in the media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–1937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑

in vitro · physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 108 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 108 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 567 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

transgenic · physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.