Paper · 2009 · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Effects of restorative agroecosystems on soil characteristics and plant production on a degraded soil in the Georgia Piedmont, USA

K.L. Jacobsen; C.F. Jordan

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract This work presents the results of a three-year field study of agroecosystems designed to restore soil organic matter (SOM) to degraded soils of the Georgia Piedmont. The systems combine a suite of management practices previously demonstrated to increase SOM when studied individually, and examine the effects of these techniques when used in combination in a cropping systems context on soil characteristics, crop production and weed biomass. The systems' components include organic management, alley cropping with perennial legumes, conservation tillage, use of winter cover crops, straw mulch and two compost application rates. Vegetable crops grown were a rotation of okra, hot pepper and a corn and winter squash intercrop. The systems were not able to maintain soil C or N without the addition of compost. Systems incorporating alley cropping, organic management, conservation tillage and compost maintained soil C, and increased in soil C when mulch was not applied. In organic, conservation tillage without alley cropping, soil C did not change significantly, even with annual 44.8 Mg ha −1 of compost additions. Patterns for soil N followed those of soil C. The study demonstrated that alley cropping can maintain and sequester soil C and N beyond organic conservation tillage alone, and more than conventionally tilled, chemically fertilized treatments. Crop yields did not vary by treatment due to high variation within treatments. Winter cover crop residue provided an effective weed barrier for 4 to 6 weeks in the spring, but additional hand weeding was required throughout the summer. The results of this systems-level study demonstrated interactions between management practices when used in combination that would not have been observed when studied individually. It also demonstrates that agroforestry techniques, conservation tillage and compost applications can increase soil C in degraded, clayey soils while they are in cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These systems could not maintain soil carbon or nitrogen without compost.

Treatment
without the addition of composte0
Outcome
soil C or Ne0
Direction
not able to maintaine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The systems were not able to maintain soil C or N without the addition of compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetable crops grown were a rotation of okra, hot pepper and a corn and winter squash intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alley cropping, organic management, conservation tillage and compost maintained soil carbon.

Treatment
alley cropping, organic management, conservation tillage and composte0
Outcome
soil Ce0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Systems incorporating alley cropping, organic management, conservation tillage and compost maintained soil C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–928 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetable crops grown were a rotation of okra, hot pepper and a corn and winter squash intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those systems increased soil carbon when mulch was omitted.

Treatment
alley cropping, organic management, conservation tillage and composte1
Outcome
soil Ce0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
when mulch was not appliede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased in soil C when mulch was not applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–980 · show in text ↑
e1

“Systems incorporating alley cropping, organic management, conservation tillage and compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–910 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vegetable crops grown were a rotation of okra, hot pepper and a corn and winter squash intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under organic conservation tillage without alley cropping, soil carbon did not change significantly despite annual compost.

Treatment
organic, conservation tillage without alley croppinge0
Outcome
soil Ce0
Direction
did not changee0
Qualifier
annual 44.8 Mg ha −1 of compost additionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In organic, conservation tillage without alley cropping, soil C did not change significantly, even with annual 44.8 Mg ha −1 of compost additions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetable crops grown were a rotation of okra, hot pepper and a corn and winter squash intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–735 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrogen followed the same patterns as soil carbon.

Outcome
soil Ne0
Comparator
soil Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Patterns for soil N followed those of soil C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1173 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetable crops grown were a rotation of okra, hot pepper and a corn and winter squash intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alley cropping maintained and sequestered more soil carbon and nitrogen than organic conservation tillage alone or conventional management.

Treatment
alley croppinge0
Outcome
soil C and Ne0
Direction
more thane0
Comparator
organic conservation tillage alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alley cropping can maintain and sequester soil C and N beyond organic conservation tillage alone, and more than conventionally tilled, chemically fertilized treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1370 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetable crops grown were a rotation of okra, hot pepper and a corn and winter squash intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop yields did not vary by treatment amid high within-treatment variation.

Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
Crop yieldse0
Direction
did not varye0
Qualifier
high variation within treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop yields did not vary by treatment due to high variation within treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1449 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetable crops grown were a rotation of okra, hot pepper and a corn and winter squash intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter cover crop residue suppressed weeds for 4 to 6 weeks in spring.

Treatment
Winter cover crop residuee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed barriere0
Value
4 to 6 weekse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crop residue provided an effective weed barrier for 4 to 6 weeks in the spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1542 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetable crops grown were a rotation of okra, hot pepper and a corn and winter squash intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–735 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Additional hand weeding remained necessary throughout summer.

Outcome
additional hand weeding was required throughout the summere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“additional hand weeding was required throughout the summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1606 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetable crops grown were a rotation of okra, hot pepper and a corn and winter squash intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–735 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining management practices revealed interactions that separate studies would not have observed.

Outcome
interactions between management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions between management practices when used in combination that would not have been observed when studied individually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1787 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetable crops grown were a rotation of okra, hot pepper and a corn and winter squash intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–735 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

organic · weed · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.