Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production

Effect of drought stress on yield and water relative content in chickpea

Mohammad Khodadadi

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the major abiotic stress in a agricultural world wide. This study was carried out to investigate the effect of drought stress on yield and water relationship content in sixteen chickpea cultivars. This research was conducted in 2010 to investigate field performance of chickpea cultivars under drought stress and non-stress condition at Ecbatan Research Station of the Agricultural and Natural Resource Research Center of Hamadan Iran. The result showed that the effects of drought stress on seed yield, biological yield, number of second branch and relative water content (RWC) was highly significant. 100 seed weight and number of day to pod filling (DF), were not affected by terminal drought stress in this study. Biological yield, number of secondary branches and 100-Seed (weight), also had positive significant correlations with seed yield. ILC482 has produced the highest yield. Also it has highest water relative content in drought condition. The lowest seed yield and biological yield obtained from Sel93th24469 cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress had highly significant effects on seed yield, biological yield and number of second branches of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
seed yield, biological yield, number of second branche2
Comparator
non-stress conditione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field performance of chickpea cultivars under drought stress and non-stress condition at Ecbatan Research Station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–386 · show in text ↑
e2

“The result showed that the effects of drought stress on seed yield, biological yield, number of second branch and relative water content (RWC) was highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress had a highly significant effect on relative water content of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
relative water content (RWC)e2
Comparator
non-stress conditione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field performance of chickpea cultivars under drought stress and non-stress condition at Ecbatan Research Station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–386 · show in text ↑
e2

“The result showed that the effects of drought stress on seed yield, biological yield, number of second branch and relative water content (RWC) was highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 seed weight and days to pod filling of chickpea were not affected by terminal drought stress.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
terminal drought stresse2
Outcome
100 seed weight and number of day to pod filling (DF)e2
Direction
not affectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field performance of chickpea cultivars under drought stress and non-stress condition at Ecbatan Research Station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–386 · show in text ↑
e2

“100 seed weight and number of day to pod filling (DF), were not affected by terminal drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–727 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological yield, secondary branch number and 100-seed weight had positive significant correlations with seed yield of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
positivee2
Setting
Ecbatan Research Statione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field performance of chickpea cultivars under drought stress and non-stress condition at Ecbatan Research Station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–386 · show in text ↑
e2

“Biological yield, number of secondary branches and 100-Seed (weight), also had positive significant correlations with seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–871 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea cultivar ILC482 produced the highest seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
ILC482e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
higheste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field performance of chickpea cultivars under drought stress and non-stress condition at Ecbatan Research Station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–386 · show in text ↑
e2

“ILC482 has produced the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–910 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea cultivar ILC482 had the highest relative water content under drought condition.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
ILC482e2
Treatment
drought conditione3
Outcome
water relative contente3
Direction
higheste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field performance of chickpea cultivars under drought stress and non-stress condition at Ecbatan Research Station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–386 · show in text ↑
e2

“ILC482 has produced the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–910 · show in text ↑
e3

“Also it has highest water relative content in drought condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–975 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Sel93th24469 produced the lowest seed yield and biological yield of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Sel93th24469e2
Outcome
seed yield and biological yielde2
Direction
loweste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“field performance of chickpea cultivars under drought stress and non-stress condition at Ecbatan Research Station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–386 · show in text ↑
e2

“The lowest seed yield and biological yield obtained from Sel93th24469 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1055 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

54 papers: 11 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.