Paper · 2012 · Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference

Effect of partial defoliation on Cylindrocarpon destructans infection of grapevines

D. Brown; E.E. Jones; H.J. Ridgway; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Oneyearold grapevines of Sauvignon blanc grafted to rootstocks 10114 or Schwarzmann were used to evaluate the effects of partial defoliation and inoculation with C destructans on disease severity incidence and dry weight accumulation Assessment 8 months after treatments showed that disease incidence was not affected by the defoliation treatments However disease severity was significantly highest for the highly defoliated plants (P0043) Incidence and severity were similar for Schwarzmann (293 and 84 respectively) and 10114 (310 and 149 respectively) Root dry weight was affected by the defoliation treatments (P0000) being significantly lower in the highly defoliated plants than the moderately defoliated and undefoliated plants (156 185 and 199 g respectively) The practice of leaf removal in young vines clearly needs to be managed when black foot is a recognised risk factor for newly planted vineyards

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial defoliation did not significantly change black foot disease incidence.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
defoliation treatmentse0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease incidence was not affected by the defoliation treatments However disease severity was significantly highest for the highly defoliated plants (P0043)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High defoliation gave the greatest disease severity.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
highly defoliated plantse0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
P0043e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease incidence was not affected by the defoliation treatments However disease severity was significantly highest for the highly defoliated plants (P0043)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence and severity were similar between Schwarzmann and 10114 rootstocks.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
Schwarzmanne0
Outcome
Incidence and severitye0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
293 and 84 respectivelye0
Comparator
10114e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incidence and severity were similar for Schwarzmann (293 and 84 respectively) and 10114 (310 and 149 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High defoliation reduced root dry weight relative to moderate and no defoliation.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
highly defoliated plantse0
Outcome
Root dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Value
156 185 and 199 ge0
Qualifier
P0000e0
Comparator
moderately defoliated and undefoliated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root dry weight was affected by the defoliation treatments (P0000) being significantly lower in the highly defoliated plants than the moderately defoliated and undefoliated plants (156 185 and 199 g respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal in young vines should be managed where black foot is a risk.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Outcome
leaf removal in young vines clearly needs to be managede0
Qualifier
black foot is a recognised risk factore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The practice of leaf removal in young vines clearly needs to be managed when black foot is a recognised risk factor for newly planted vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑

pruning · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

pruning · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

48 papers: 29 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.