Paper · 2010 · Soil Research

Effect of ridge tillage, no-tillage, and conventional tillage on soil temperature, water use, and crop performance in cold and semi-arid areas in Northeast China

Jin He; Hongwen Li; N. J. Kuhn; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
78
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In cold and semi-arid Northeast China, insufficient soil accumulative temperature and low water use efficiency (WUE) are the limiting factors for the further development of agriculture. Ridge tillage (RT) has been proposed to improve soil temperature and water conservation. Data from a 3-year field experiment conducted at two locations (Sujiatun and Lanxi) in Northeast China were used to compare RT, no-tillage (NT), and conventional tillage (CT) in a spring maize cropping system. At both sites, RT and NT significantly (P < 0.05) increased mean soil temperature to 0.10 m depth, relative to CT, by 0.7–2.4°C in the cold season during the spring maize growing stage. Mean soil moisture depletion in the RT treatment was greater by 1.2–4.1% (Sujiatun) and 0.6–3.0% (Lanxi) than in NT and CT, respectively. Mean maize yields over 3 years for RT were ~9.9% greater than for CT, whereas the yield advantage in the NT treatment was only slight. In Sujiatun, WUE was 8.0% and 8.6% greater under RT than under NT and CT, respectively, and in Lanxi, WUE was 7.7% and 9.6% greater under RT than NT and CT. Ridge tillage is recommended to the farmers to obtain higher crop yield and WUE in Northeast China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge tillage increased mean soil temperature to 0.10 m depth relative to conventional tillage by 0.7–2.4°C in the cold season.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
RTe1
Outcome
mean soil temperature to 0.10 m depthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.7–2.4°Ce1
Comparator
CTe1
Setting
cold seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“RT and NT significantly (P < 0.05) increased mean soil temperature to 0.10 m depth, relative to CT, by 0.7–2.4°C in the cold season during the spring maize growing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–669 · show in text ↑
e0

“a spring maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased mean soil temperature to 0.10 m depth relative to conventional tillage by 0.7–2.4°C in the cold season.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
NTe1
Outcome
mean soil temperature to 0.10 m depthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.7–2.4°Ce1
Comparator
CTe1
Setting
cold seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“RT and NT significantly (P < 0.05) increased mean soil temperature to 0.10 m depth, relative to CT, by 0.7–2.4°C in the cold season during the spring maize growing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–669 · show in text ↑
e0

“a spring maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture depletion under ridge tillage was greater by 1.2–4.1% at Sujiatun than under no-tillage and conventional tillage.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
RTe2
Outcome
Mean soil moisture depletione2
Direction
greatere2
Value
1.2–4.1%e2
Comparator
NT and CTe2
Setting
Sujiatune2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Mean soil moisture depletion in the RT treatment was greater by 1.2–4.1% (Sujiatun) and 0.6–3.0% (Lanxi) than in NT and CT, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–807 · show in text ↑
e0

“a spring maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture depletion under ridge tillage was greater by 0.6–3.0% at Lanxi than under no-tillage and conventional tillage.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
RTe2
Outcome
Mean soil moisture depletione2
Direction
greatere2
Value
0.6–3.0%e2
Comparator
NT and CTe2
Setting
Lanxie2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Mean soil moisture depletion in the RT treatment was greater by 1.2–4.1% (Sujiatun) and 0.6–3.0% (Lanxi) than in NT and CT, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–807 · show in text ↑
e0

“a spring maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean maize yield over 3 years under ridge tillage was about 9.9% greater than under conventional tillage.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
RTe3
Outcome
Mean maize yieldse3
Direction
greatere3
Value
~9.9%e3
Qualifier
over 3 yearse3
Comparator
CTe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Mean maize yields over 3 years for RT were ~9.9% greater than for CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–877 · show in text ↑
e0

“a spring maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage gave only a slight yield advantage.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
NTe4
Outcome
yield advantagee4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Qualifier
only slighte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“whereas the yield advantage in the NT treatment was only slight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–942 · show in text ↑
e0

“a spring maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge tillage increased WUE by 8.0% relative to no-tillage at Sujiatun.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
RTe5
Outcome
WUEe5
Direction
greatere5
Value
8.0%e5
Comparator
NTe5
Setting
Sujiatune5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In Sujiatun, WUE was 8.0% and 8.6% greater under RT than under NT and CT, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1030 · show in text ↑
e0

“a spring maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge tillage increased WUE by 8.6% relative to conventional tillage at Sujiatun.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
RTe5
Outcome
WUEe5
Direction
greatere5
Value
8.6%e5
Comparator
CTe5
Setting
Sujiatune5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In Sujiatun, WUE was 8.0% and 8.6% greater under RT than under NT and CT, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1030 · show in text ↑
e0

“a spring maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge tillage increased WUE by 7.7% relative to no-tillage at Lanxi.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
RTe6
Outcome
WUEe6
Direction
greatere6
Value
7.7%e6
Comparator
NTe6
Setting
Lanxie6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“in Lanxi, WUE was 7.7% and 9.6% greater under RT than NT and CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1099 · show in text ↑
e0

“a spring maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge tillage increased WUE by 9.6% relative to conventional tillage at Lanxi.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
RTe6
Outcome
WUEe6
Direction
greatere6
Value
9.6%e6
Comparator
CTe6
Setting
Lanxie6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“in Lanxi, WUE was 7.7% and 9.6% greater under RT than NT and CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1099 · show in text ↑
e0

“a spring maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–483 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge tillage is recommended to farmers to obtain higher crop yield and WUE in Northeast China.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Ridge tillagee7
Outcome
higher crop yield and WUEe7
Setting
Northeast Chinae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Ridge tillage is recommended to the farmers to obtain higher crop yield and WUE in Northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1199 · show in text ↑
e0

“a spring maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–483 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 75 positive, 8 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 124 positive, 28 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.