Paper · 2013 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Delayed softening of papaya (Carica papaya L. cv. Sekaki) fruit by 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) during ripening at ambient and low temperature storage conditions

Azhane Ahmad; Zainon Mohd Ali; Zamri Zainal

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ripening of climacteric fruit such as papaya (Carica papaya L. cv.Sekaki) fruit depends on the ethylene action which later accompanied by softening process that can influence postharvest quality and storability of the fruit. Ethylene action inhibitors, 1-Methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) has been found to inhibit ethylene action and thus it can delay the fruit ripening process. The effects of 1-MCP on softening related changes were determined through skin color, weight loss, fruit firmness and activities of the cell wall degrading enzymes including alpha-galactosidase, beta-galactosidase and pectinmethylesterase (PME) during ripening. In this study, fruit were treated with 90 ppb concentration of 1-MCP gaseous vapors for 12 hours in airtight container maintained at 20 degreesC. After treatments the fruit were randomly divided into two different storage temperature conditions; ambient temperature (28 degreesC) and low temperature (10 degreesC). Papayas at 10 degreesC conditions were packaged in polyethylene plastic stored for 4 weeks (28 days) and taken out on day 29 and left to ripen at ambient temperature (28 degreesC).Fruit treated with 1-MCP experienced a significant delayed in skin color development, weight loss and reduced firmness loss compared to the fruit without 1-MCP treatment. As softening progressed, activity of the cell wall degrading enzymes in fruit without 1-MCP treatment increased significantly coincident with a rapid declined in fruit firmness for both storage conditions. With 1-MCP, fruit demonstrated a delay in activity of cell wall degrading enzymes but continued to increase until 100 % yellow. Furthermore, the treated 1-MCP papaya fruit stored at 10 degreesC can retain shelf life for 5 days at ambient temperature without any spoilage from chilling injury (CI).Thus it may be concluded that the 1-MCP treatment may aid in delaying the softening process and further storage at low temperature extended the postharvest life and maintained the quality of the papaya fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP significantly delayed skin color development and weight loss of papaya fruit compared with untreated fruit.

Taxon
Carica papaya L.Carica papayae0
Material
cv.Sekakie0
Organ / stage
Fruite1
Treatment
90 ppb concentration of 1-MCP gaseous vaporse2
Outcome
skin color development, weight losse1
Direction
delayede1
Comparator
fruit without 1-MCP treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ripening of climacteric fruit such as papaya (Carica papaya L. cv.Sekaki) fruit depends on the ethylene action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit treated with 1-MCP experienced a significant delayed in skin color development, weight loss and reduced firmness loss compared to the fruit without 1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1300 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruit were treated with 90 ppb concentration of 1-MCP gaseous vapors for 12 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP significantly reduced firmness loss of papaya fruit compared with untreated fruit.

Taxon
Carica papaya L.Carica papayae0
Material
cv.Sekakie0
Treatment
90 ppb concentration of 1-MCP gaseous vaporse2
Outcome
firmness losse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
fruit without 1-MCP treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ripening of climacteric fruit such as papaya (Carica papaya L. cv.Sekaki) fruit depends on the ethylene action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit treated with 1-MCP experienced a significant delayed in skin color development, weight loss and reduced firmness loss compared to the fruit without 1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1300 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruit were treated with 90 ppb concentration of 1-MCP gaseous vapors for 12 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–732 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell wall degrading enzyme activity increased significantly in untreated papaya fruit during softening.

Taxon
Carica papaya L.Carica papayae0
Material
cv.Sekakie0
Outcome
activity of the cell wall degrading enzymese3
Direction
increased significantlye3
Qualifier
without 1-MCP treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ripening of climacteric fruit such as papaya (Carica papaya L. cv.Sekaki) fruit depends on the ethylene action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“activity of the cell wall degrading enzymes in fruit without 1-MCP treatment increased significantly coincident with a rapid declined in fruit firmness for both storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1506 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmness of untreated papaya fruit declined rapidly, coincident with rising enzyme activity, in both storage conditions.

Taxon
Carica papaya L.Carica papayae0
Material
cv.Sekakie0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse3
Direction
rapid declinede3
Qualifier
for both storage conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ripening of climacteric fruit such as papaya (Carica papaya L. cv.Sekaki) fruit depends on the ethylene action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“activity of the cell wall degrading enzymes in fruit without 1-MCP treatment increased significantly coincident with a rapid declined in fruit firmness for both storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP delayed the activity of cell wall degrading enzymes in papaya fruit, which still increased until 100% yellow.

Taxon
Carica papaya L.Carica papayae0
Material
cv.Sekakie0
Treatment
1-MCPe4
Outcome
activity of cell wall degrading enzymese4
Direction
delaye4
Qualifier
continued to increase until 100 % yellowe4
Comparator
without 1-MCP treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ripening of climacteric fruit such as papaya (Carica papaya L. cv.Sekaki) fruit depends on the ethylene action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“activity of the cell wall degrading enzymes in fruit without 1-MCP treatment increased significantly coincident with a rapid declined in fruit firmness for both storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1506 · show in text ↑
e4

“With 1-MCP, fruit demonstrated a delay in activity of cell wall degrading enzymes but continued to increase until 100 % yellow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated papaya fruit stored at 10 degreesC retained shelf life for 5 days at ambient temperature without chilling injury spoilage.

Taxon
Carica papaya L.Carica papayae0
Material
cv.Sekakie0
Outcome
shelf lifee5
Value
5 dayse5
Qualifier
without any spoilage from chilling injury (CI)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ripening of climacteric fruit such as papaya (Carica papaya L. cv.Sekaki) fruit depends on the ethylene action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e5

“the treated 1-MCP papaya fruit stored at 10 degreesC can retain shelf life for 5 days at ambient temperature without any spoilage from chilling injury (CI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1804 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Carica papaya (papaya)Results differ

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: enzyme activity · Carica papaya (papaya)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.