Paper · 2011 · Journal of Chemical Ecology

Population-Related Variation in Plant Defense more Strongly Affects Survival of an Herbivore than Its Solitary Parasitoid Wasp

Jeffrey A. Harvey; Rieta Gols

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
39
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The performance of natural enemies, such as parasitoid wasps, is affected by differences in the quality of the host's diet, frequently mediated by species or population-related differences in plant allelochemistry. Here, we compared survival, development time, and body mass in a generalist herbivore, the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae, and its solitary endoparasitoid, Microplitis mediator, when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea. Plants either were undamaged or induced by feeding of larvae of the cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapae. Development and biomass of M. brassicae and Mi. mediator were similar on both cultivated and one wild cabbage population (KIM), intermediate on the OH population, and significantly lower on the WIN population. Moreover, development was prolonged and biomass was reduced on herbivore-induced plants. However, only the survival of parasitized hosts (and not that of healthy larvae) was affected by induction. Analysis of glucosinolates in leaves of the cabbages revealed higher levels in the wild populations than cultivars, with the highest concentrations in WIN plants. Multivariate statistics revealed a negative correlation between insect performance and total levels of glucosinolates (GS) and levels of 3-butenyl GS. However, GS chemistry could not explain the reduced performance on induced plants since only indole GS concentrations increased in response to herbivory, which did not affect insect performance based on multivariate statistics. This result suggests that, in addition to aliphatic GS, other non-GS chemicals are responsible for the decline in insect performance, and that these chemicals affect the parasitoid more strongly than the host. Remarkably, when developing on WIN plants, the survival of Mi. mediator to adult eclosion was much higher than in its host, M. brassicae. This may be due to the fact that hosts parasitized by Mi. mediator pass through fewer instars, and host growth is arrested when they are only a fraction of the size of healthy caterpillars. Certain aspects of the biology and life-history of the host and parasitoid may determine their response to chemical challenges imposed by the food plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Development and biomass of M. brassicae and Mi. mediator were similar on cultivated cabbages and the KIM wild population.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Interactor
M. brassicaeMamestra brassicaee1herbivore
Second interactor
Mi. mediatore1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Development and biomasse1
Qualifier
similar on both cultivated and one wild cabbage population (KIM)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mamestra brassicae
Mamestra brassicae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryThis image is created by user B. Schoenmakers at Waarneming.nl , a source of nature observations in the Netherlands. · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Development and biomass of M. brassicae and Mi. mediator were similar on both cultivated and one wild cabbage population (KIM), intermediate on the OH population, and significantly lower on the WIN population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–825 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Development and biomass of M. brassicae and Mi. mediator were significantly lower on the WIN population.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Material
WIN populatione1
Interactor
M. brassicaeMamestra brassicaee1herbivore
Second interactor
Mi. mediatore1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Development and biomasse1
Direction
significantly lowere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mamestra brassicae
Mamestra brassicae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryThis image is created by user B. Schoenmakers at Waarneming.nl , a source of nature observations in the Netherlands. · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Development and biomass of M. brassicae and Mi. mediator were similar on both cultivated and one wild cabbage population (KIM), intermediate on the OH population, and significantly lower on the WIN population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–825 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Development and biomass of M. brassicae and Mi. mediator were intermediate on the OH population.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Material
OH populatione1
Interactor
M. brassicaeMamestra brassicaee1herbivore
Second interactor
Mi. mediatore1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Development and biomasse1
Direction
intermediatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mamestra brassicae
Mamestra brassicae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryThis image is created by user B. Schoenmakers at Waarneming.nl , a source of nature observations in the Netherlands. · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Development and biomass of M. brassicae and Mi. mediator were similar on both cultivated and one wild cabbage population (KIM), intermediate on the OH population, and significantly lower on the WIN population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–825 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Development was prolonged on herbivore-induced cabbage plants.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Treatment
herbivore-induced plantse1
Outcome
developmente1
Direction
prolongede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Moreover, development was prolonged and biomass was reduced on herbivore-induced plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–914 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass was reduced on herbivore-induced cabbage plants.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Treatment
herbivore-induced plantse1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
reducede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Moreover, development was prolonged and biomass was reduced on herbivore-induced plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–914 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival of parasitized hosts, but not of healthy larvae, was affected by induction.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Treatment
inductione1
Outcome
the survival of parasitized hostse1
Qualifier
affected by inductione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“However, only the survival of parasitized hosts (and not that of healthy larvae) was affected by induction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1022 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild cabbage populations had higher glucosinolate levels in leaves than cultivars, highest in WIN plants.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Material
wild populationse1
Outcome
glucosinolates in leavese1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
with the highest concentrations in WIN plantse1
Comparator
cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Analysis of glucosinolates in leaves of the cabbages revealed higher levels in the wild populations than cultivars, with the highest concentrations in WIN plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1185 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect performance was negatively correlated with total glucosinolate levels and 3-butenyl GS levels.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Compound
glucosinolates (GS)e1
Outcome
insect performancee1
Direction
negative correlatione1
Qualifier
3-butenyl GSe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Multivariate statistics revealed a negative correlation between insect performance and total levels of glucosinolates (GS) and levels of 3-butenyl GS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1336 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GS chemistry could not explain the reduced performance on herbivore-induced plants.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Compound
GSe1
Outcome
reduced performance on induced plantse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“However, GS chemistry could not explain the reduced performance on induced plants since only indole GS concentrations increased in response to herbivory, which did not affect insect performance based on multivariate statistics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1564 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indole GS concentrations increased in response to herbivory.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Treatment
herbivorye1
Compound
indole GSe1
Outcome
indole GS concentrationse1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“However, GS chemistry could not explain the reduced performance on induced plants since only indole GS concentrations increased in response to herbivory, which did not affect insect performance based on multivariate statistics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1564 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indole GS did not affect insect performance based on multivariate statistics.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Compound
indole GSe1
Outcome
insect performancee1
Qualifier
based on multivariate statisticse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“However, GS chemistry could not explain the reduced performance on induced plants since only indole GS concentrations increased in response to herbivory, which did not affect insect performance based on multivariate statistics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1564 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Other non-GS chemicals are likely responsible for the decline in insect performance and affect the parasitoid more strongly than the host.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Compound
other non-GS chemicalse1
Outcome
decline in insect performancee1
Qualifier
these chemicals affect the parasitoid more strongly than the hoste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This result suggests that, in addition to aliphatic GS, other non-GS chemicals are responsible for the decline in insect performance, and that these chemicals affect the parasitoid more strongly than the host”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1774 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On WIN plants, survival of Mi. mediator to adult eclosion was higher than that of its host M. brassicae.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Material
WIN plantse1
Interactor
Mi. mediatore1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
M. brassicaeMamestra brassicaee1herbivore
Outcome
survival of Mi. mediator to adult eclosione1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
its host, M. brassicaee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mamestra brassicae
Mamestra brassicae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryThis image is created by user B. Schoenmakers at Waarneming.nl , a source of nature observations in the Netherlands. · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Remarkably, when developing on WIN plants, the survival of Mi. mediator to adult eclosion was much higher than in its host, M. brassicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–1912 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitized hosts may pass through fewer instars, and host growth is arrested at a fraction of healthy caterpillar size.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Interactor
Mi. mediatore1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pass through fewer instarse1
Qualifier
host growth is arrested when they are only a fraction of the size of healthy caterpillarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This may be due to the fact that hosts parasitized by Mi. mediator pass through fewer instars, and host growth is arrested when they are only a fraction of the size of healthy caterpillars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2102 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Biology and life-history of host and parasitoid may determine their response to chemical challenges from the food plant.

Taxon
Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceae2
Outcome
their response to chemical challenges imposed by the food plante1
Qualifier
biology and life-history of the host and parasitoide1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Certain aspects of the biology and life-history of the host and parasitoid may determine their response to chemical challenges imposed by the food plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2104–2256 · show in text ↑
e2

“when reared on two cultivated (CYR and STH) and three wild (KIM, OH, and WIN) populations of cabbage, Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–514 · show in text ↑