Paper · 1987 · New Phytologist

SEASONAL AND DIURNAL CHANGES IN ABSCISIC ACID AND WATER RELATIONS OF APRICOT LEAVES (PRUNUS ARMENIACA L.)

B. R. LOVEYS; S. P. ROBINSON; W. J. S. DOWNTON

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

S ummary Seasonal and diurnal changes in leaf water relations, stomatal behaviour and abscisic acid were studied in apricot ( Prunus armeniaca L.) trees growing in Adelaide, Australia. Diurnal changes in stomatal conductance and foliar abscisic acid (ABA) were small and the ABA content of expressed xylem sap was low (0·3 to 0·9 × 10 −4 mol m −3 ). This concentration of ABA was too low to influence stomatal conductance, although diurnal changes and some seasonal changes in leaf ABA could be accounted for by uptake from the xylem. Water potential fell throughout the growing season but high values of turgor were maintained by a corresponding fall in leaf osmotic potential. The fall in leaf osmotic potential was partly accounted for by a decrease in relative water content but measurements of osmotic potential at full turgor showed that there was a net accumulation of solute between December and March. Sorbitol was the solute chiefly responsible for this increase. The ability of apricot leaves to synthesize ABA in response to zero turgor was greatly reduced between November and March, although this ability was partly regained in April. ABA appears to be relatively unimportant in the control of stomatal conductance in apricot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diurnal changes in conductance and foliar ABA were small.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
stomatal conductance and foliar abscisic acid (ABA)e0
Direction
smalle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diurnal changes in stomatal conductance and foliar abscisic acid (ABA) were small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xylem sap ABA content was low, at 0·3 to 0·9 × 10 −4 mol m −3.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
ABA content of expressed xylem sape0
Direction
lowe0
Value
0·3 to 0·9 × 10 −4 mol m −3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA content of expressed xylem sap was low (0·3 to 0·9 × 10 −4 mol m −3 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–348 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That sap ABA concentration was too low to affect stomatal conductance.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Compound
ABAe0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Qualifier
too low to influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This concentration of ABA was too low to influence stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–421 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xylem uptake could account for diurnal and some seasonal changes in leaf ABA.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
leaf ABAe0
Qualifier
uptake from the xyleme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diurnal changes and some seasonal changes in leaf ABA could be accounted for by uptake from the xylem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water potential fell over the growing season.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
Water potentiale0
Direction
felle0
Qualifier
throughout the growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water potential fell throughout the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turgor stayed high as leaf osmotic potential fell.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
turgore0
Direction
maintainede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high values of turgor were maintained by a corresponding fall in leaf osmotic potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Declining relative water content partly explained the fall in leaf osmotic potential.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
leaf osmotic potentiale0
Qualifier
decrease in relative water contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fall in leaf osmotic potential was partly accounted for by a decrease in relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solute accumulated between December and March.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
net accumulation of solutee0
Qualifier
between December and Marche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a net accumulation of solute between December and March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbitol chiefly accounted for the solute increase.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Compound
Sorbitole0
Outcome
this increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorbitol was the solute chiefly responsible for this increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capacity to synthesize ABA under zero turgor declined from November to March.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae0
Outcome
ability of apricot leaves to synthesize ABAe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
between November and Marche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ability of apricot leaves to synthesize ABA in response to zero turgor was greatly reduced between November and March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1095 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capacity to synthesize ABA under zero turgor partly recovered in April.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
this abilitye0
Direction
partly regainede0
Qualifier
in Aprile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this ability was partly regained in April”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA appears relatively unimportant for controlling stomatal conductance.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae0
Compound
ABAe0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA appears to be relatively unimportant in the control of stomatal conductance in apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1239 · show in text ↑