Abstract
Controlling competing vegetation during early growth is one of the most important practices for the successful establishment of poplar plantations. Today, most poplar plantations in temperate regions are established on abandoned marginal agricultural land where competing vegetation is usually present during the first years after planting. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine how the growth of two kinds of poplar planting materials, un-rooted cuttings and bare-rooted seedlings was influenced by different vegetation control and soil preparation practices. Across treatments, un-rooted cuttings grew more rapidly than the bare-rooted seedlings. Our results also show that mulching with a degradable carpet or permanent polyethylene plastic increased seedling growth to a similar extent and more strongly in the cases of no treatment (in control plots). In addition, the results suggest that soil preparation in the mulched area favored seedling growth, but this effect was restricted to the first year after planting. These findings indicate that optimal practices for establishing poplar plantations on former agricultural land include planting un-rooted cuttings in prepared soil and mulching.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Un-rooted cuttings grew faster than bare-rooted seedlings across treatments.
- Material
- un-rooted cuttingse0
- Outcome
- grew more rapidlye0
- Direction
- more rapidlye0
- Comparator
- bare-rooted seedlingse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Across treatments, un-rooted cuttings grew more rapidly than the bare-rooted seedlings”
t0“Poplar Plantations”
Claim · model-written summary
Degradable carpet mulching increased seedling growth relative to no treatment.
- Treatment
- mulching with a degradable carpete0
- Outcome
- seedling growthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- no treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“mulching with a degradable carpet or permanent polyethylene plastic increased seedling growth to a similar extent and more strongly in the cases of no treatment (in control plots)”
t0“Poplar Plantations”
Claim · model-written summary
Permanent polyethylene plastic mulching increased seedling growth relative to no treatment.
- Treatment
- permanent polyethylene plastice0
- Outcome
- seedling growthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- no treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“mulching with a degradable carpet or permanent polyethylene plastic increased seedling growth to a similar extent and more strongly in the cases of no treatment (in control plots)”
t0“Poplar Plantations”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil preparation within the mulched area favored seedling growth in the first year only.
- Treatment
- soil preparation in the mulched areae0
- Outcome
- seedling growthe0
- Direction
- favorede0
- Qualifier
- restricted to the first year after plantinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“soil preparation in the mulched area favored seedling growth, but this effect was restricted to the first year after planting”
t0“Poplar Plantations”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend un-rooted cuttings in prepared soil with mulching on former agricultural land.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“optimal practices for establishing poplar plantations on former agricultural land include planting un-rooted cuttings in prepared soil and mulching”
The same questions in other papers
mulching · growth · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.