Paper · 2015 · Forests

Exploration of Optimal Agricultural Practices and Seedling Types for Establishing Poplar Plantations

Henrik Böhlenius; Rolf Övergaard

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Controlling competing vegetation during early growth is one of the most important practices for the successful establishment of poplar plantations. Today, most poplar plantations in temperate regions are established on abandoned marginal agricultural land where competing vegetation is usually present during the first years after planting. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine how the growth of two kinds of poplar planting materials, un-rooted cuttings and bare-rooted seedlings was influenced by different vegetation control and soil preparation practices. Across treatments, un-rooted cuttings grew more rapidly than the bare-rooted seedlings. Our results also show that mulching with a degradable carpet or permanent polyethylene plastic increased seedling growth to a similar extent and more strongly in the cases of no treatment (in control plots). In addition, the results suggest that soil preparation in the mulched area favored seedling growth, but this effect was restricted to the first year after planting. These findings indicate that optimal practices for establishing poplar plantations on former agricultural land include planting un-rooted cuttings in prepared soil and mulching.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Un-rooted cuttings grew faster than bare-rooted seedlings across treatments.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Material
un-rooted cuttingse0
Outcome
grew more rapidlye0
Direction
more rapidlye0
Comparator
bare-rooted seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across treatments, un-rooted cuttings grew more rapidly than the bare-rooted seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Degradable carpet mulching increased seedling growth relative to no treatment.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Treatment
mulching with a degradable carpete0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching with a degradable carpet or permanent polyethylene plastic increased seedling growth to a similar extent and more strongly in the cases of no treatment (in control plots)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent polyethylene plastic mulching increased seedling growth relative to no treatment.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Treatment
permanent polyethylene plastice0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching with a degradable carpet or permanent polyethylene plastic increased seedling growth to a similar extent and more strongly in the cases of no treatment (in control plots)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil preparation within the mulched area favored seedling growth in the first year only.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Treatment
soil preparation in the mulched areae0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
favorede0
Qualifier
restricted to the first year after plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil preparation in the mulched area favored seedling growth, but this effect was restricted to the first year after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend un-rooted cuttings in prepared soil with mulching on former agricultural land.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Outcome
planting un-rooted cuttings in prepared soil and mulchinge0
Setting
former agricultural lande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimal practices for establishing poplar plantations on former agricultural land include planting un-rooted cuttings in prepared soil and mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1209 · show in text ↑

mulching · growth · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.