Paper · 1995 · Compost Science & Utilization

Composting and Evaluating a Pulp and Paper Sludge for Use as a Soil Amendment/Mulch

Alton G. Campbell; Xiaoguang Zhang; Robert R. Tripepi

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
60
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Composting could be used in the pulp and paper industry to treat primary sludges as an alternative to landfilling. The objective of this project was to compost and evaluate a pulp and paper sludge for use as a soil amendment/mulch. Primary sludge, tailings, wood ash (0, 5 or 10 percent by volume), and paunch (cattle stomach contents and tissue) from a slaughterhouse were composted in a 91 m windrow that was turned one to two times per week. The pile moisture content and temperature were controlled at 50 percent and 57–63°C during 14 weeks of composting. The compost was then cured for 4 weeks for a total treatment time of 18 weeks. Sludge dry mass decreased by approximately 50 percent, pH increased slightly to 8.2 to 8.5, and carbon-nitrogen ratio decreased from 270:1 to 14–67:1 after composting and curing. Electrical conductivity of all final composts was over 4 dS/m. Shoot biomass of tomato plants grown in a compost-amended medium (50 percent compost, 25 percent sand, 25 percent perlite by volume) improved with composting time but was still only 35–65 percent that of plants grown in a peat moss-amended medium (control). Shoot weight and height of poplar plants grown in soil amended with aged compost were unaffected by compost application rate (incorporated or as a mulch) at less than or equal to 180 Mg/ha. In summary, this study demonstrated that a pulp and paper sludge and wood ash mixture yielded a compost that could be used as a low quality mulch or soil amendment for poplar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot biomass of tomato grown in compost-amended medium improved with composting time.

Treatment
compost-amended mediume0
Outcome
Shoot biomasse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
with composting timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot biomass of tomato plants grown in a compost-amended medium (50 percent compost, 25 percent sand, 25 percent perlite by volume) improved with composting time but was still only 35–65 percent that of plants grown in a peat moss-amended medium (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot biomass of tomato grown in compost-amended medium was lower than in peat moss-amended medium, at 35–65 percent of the control.

Treatment
compost-amended mediume0
Outcome
Shoot biomasse0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
35–65 percente0
Comparator
peat moss-amended medium (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot biomass of tomato plants grown in a compost-amended medium (50 percent compost, 25 percent sand, 25 percent perlite by volume) improved with composting time but was still only 35–65 percent that of plants grown in a peat moss-amended medium (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot weight and height of poplar were unaffected by compost application rate up to 180 Mg/ha.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
compost application rate (incorporated or as a mulch)e1
Outcome
Shoot weight and heighte1
Direction
unaffectede1
Qualifier
at less than or equal to 180 Mg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Shoot weight and height of poplar plants grown in soil amended with aged compost were unaffected by compost application rate (incorporated or as a mulch) at less than or equal to 180 Mg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1327 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The pulp and paper sludge and wood ash compost can be used as a low quality mulch or soil amendment for poplar.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse2
Treatment
a pulp and paper sludge and wood ash mixturee2
Outcome
low quality mulch or soil amendmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“In summary, this study demonstrated that a pulp and paper sludge and wood ash mixture yielded a compost that could be used as a low quality mulch or soil amendment for poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge dry mass decreased by approximately 50 percent during composting and curing.

Outcome
Sludge dry masse3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
approximately 50 percente3

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e3

“Sludge dry mass decreased by approximately 50 percent, pH increased slightly to 8.2 to 8.5, and carbon-nitrogen ratio decreased from 270:1 to 14–67:1 after composting and curing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–816 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pH of the sludge compost increased slightly to 8.2 to 8.5.

Outcome
pHe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
8.2 to 8.5e3

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e3

“Sludge dry mass decreased by approximately 50 percent, pH increased slightly to 8.2 to 8.5, and carbon-nitrogen ratio decreased from 270:1 to 14–67:1 after composting and curing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–816 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The carbon-nitrogen ratio of the sludge compost decreased from 270:1 to 14–67:1.

Outcome
carbon-nitrogen ratioe3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
14–67:1e3

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e3

“Sludge dry mass decreased by approximately 50 percent, pH increased slightly to 8.2 to 8.5, and carbon-nitrogen ratio decreased from 270:1 to 14–67:1 after composting and curing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–816 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrical conductivity of all final composts was over 4 dS/m.

Outcome
Electrical conductivitye4
Value
over 4 dS/me4

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e4

“Electrical conductivity of all final composts was over 4 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–879 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Populus (poplar)Results differ

46 papers: 36 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

mulching · growth · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

in vitro · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 93 positive, 30 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.