Paper · 1988 · Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Biomass and nitrogen dynamics of hybrid poplar on two different soils: implications for fertilization strategy

Edward A. Hansen; Richard A. McLaughlin; Phillip E. Pope

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
70
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

One concern of short-rotation intensively cultured hardwood plantations is the accelerated loss of nutrients due to removal of large amounts of biomass and short harvest cycles. In this study, we examine simultaneously the nitrogen trends in all the various pools (trees, weeds, soil, and soil water). We compare the N trends and fertilization rates with leaf N status and tree growth on two soil types over 5 years. The data show a gradual transition from an early herbaceous plant dominated system to a tree-dominated system later in the rotation. On the more fertile site, fertilization was not beneficial to tree growth the 1st year, or even the 2nd, if all weeds were kept out. However, when weeds were present, fertilization was very beneficial to tree growth in the 2nd and 3rd years. After crown closure, fertilization declined in importance as herbaceous vegetation was eliminated, tree foliage biomass stabilized, and N cycling increased. Foliar N was strongly related to fertilizer rate during years 2 and 3 on the fertile site and during the entire 5 years on the infertile site. Form these relations and others, we infer possible critical times for N fertilization during the first 5 years of a rapidly growing hybrid poplar plantation from the time of initial planting through complete canopy closure and shading out of the herbaceous competition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plantation shifted from herbaceous plant dominance to tree dominance over the rotation.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Outcome
transition from an early herbaceous plant dominated system to a tree-dominated systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a gradual transition from an early herbaceous plant dominated system to a tree-dominated system later in the rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On the fertile site with weeds excluded, fertilization did not benefit tree growth in the first or second year.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
not beneficiale0
Qualifier
if all weeds were kept oute0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the more fertile site, fertilization was not beneficial to tree growth the 1st year, or even the 2nd, if all weeds were kept out.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With weeds present, fertilization benefited tree growth in years two and three.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Treatment
fertilizatione0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
very beneficiale0
Qualifier
when weeds were presente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when weeds were present, fertilization was very beneficial to tree growth in the 2nd and 3rd years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After crown closure, fertilization declined in importance.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Outcome
fertilizatione0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
After crown closuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After crown closure, fertilization declined in importance as herbaceous vegetation was eliminated, tree foliage biomass stabilized, and N cycling increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbaceous vegetation was eliminated after crown closure.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Interactor
herbaceous vegetatione0weed
Outcome
herbaceous vegetatione0
Direction
eliminatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbaceous vegetation was eliminated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree foliage biomass stabilized after crown closure.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Outcome
tree foliage biomasse0
Direction
stabilizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tree foliage biomass stabilized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen cycling increased after crown closure.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Outcome
N cyclinge0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N cycling increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen was strongly related to fertilizer rate on the fertile site in years two and three.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Treatment
fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
Foliar Ne0
Qualifier
during years 2 and 3 on the fertile sitee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar N was strongly related to fertilizer rate during years 2 and 3 on the fertile site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen was strongly related to fertilizer rate throughout five years on the infertile site.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Treatment
fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
Foliar Ne0
Qualifier
during the entire 5 years on the infertile sitee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar N was strongly related to fertilizer rate during years 2 and 3 on the fertile site and during the entire 5 years on the infertile site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–46 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer critical fertilization times across the first five plantation years.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Outcome
possible critical times for N fertilization during the first 5 yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we infer possible critical times for N fertilization during the first 5 years of a rapidly growing hybrid poplar plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1248 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Populus (poplar)Results differ

46 papers: 36 positive, 10 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.