Paper · 2016 · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Nitrogen fertilization of poplar plantations on agricultural land: effects on diameter increments and leaching

Ioannis Dimitriou; Blas Mola-Yudego

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fast-growing poplar plantations on agricultural land require intensive management activities, often involving fertilization. The present paper aims at investigating the effect of fertilization on growth and on groundwater quality, by examining four trials established in commercial poplar plantations in central and south Sweden. The treatments consisted of nitrogen applications (Urea N46, Tot. N: 46%) in two different dosages, 75 and 150 kg ha−1 for two years, and a control, in three replicates (plot size: 20 × 20 m) following a randomized block design. Diameters were measured at each plot at the end of each growing season for the period 2012–2015. At the same time, groundwater pipes were installed in the center of each plot, at ca. 1.5 m depth. Samples were regularly collected and analyzed for NO3-N and PO4-P. The results show a large variation in the diameter growth response to nitrogen fertilization and the leaching of poplar plantations after canopy closure. In young plantations, the effect on growth was clear with moderate fertilization rates although it was not observed on sandy soils with already good growth, leading to high nitrogen leaching.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diameter growth response to nitrogen fertilization varied substantially after canopy closure.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
diameter growth responsee0
Qualifier
after canopy closuree0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results show a large variation in the diameter growth response to nitrogen fertilization and the leaching of poplar plantations after canopy closure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaching from fertilized poplar plantations varied after canopy closure.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
leaching of poplar plantationse0
Qualifier
after canopy closuree0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results show a large variation in the diameter growth response to nitrogen fertilization and the leaching of poplar plantations after canopy closure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization clearly increased growth in young plantations.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
moderate fertilization ratese0
Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
young plantationse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In young plantations, the effect on growth was clear with moderate fertilization rates although it was not observed on sandy soils with already good growth, leading to high nitrogen leaching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth response to moderate fertilization was not observed on sandy soils with good growth.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
moderate fertilization ratese1
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
not observede0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was not observed on sandy soils with already good growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1131 · show in text ↑
e1

“moderate fertilization rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sandy soils with already good growth showed high nitrogen leaching after fertilization.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Outcome
nitrogen leachinge0
Direction
highe0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sandy soils with already good growth, leading to high nitrogen leaching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Populus (poplar)Results differ

46 papers: 36 positive, 10 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.