Paper · 2014 · Environment Control in Biology

Effects of Shading on Growth and Photosynthetic Potential of Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) Cultivars

Takuya ARAKI; Thay Thay OO; Fumitake KUBOTA

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of shading on growth and photosynthetic potential was analyzed with 8 cultivars with greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Plants grown in 5 L pots were subjected to 2-week shading treatment and after 2-week recovery by removing a black-cheese cloth. Photosynthetic potential was evaluated by electron transport rate sealed on the both leaf surfaces by vaseline, which is close relationship to gross photosynthetic rate because CO2 released by the reaction of photorespiration is recycled by stroma in chloroplast. Shading treatment reduced total dry weight of all cultivars. In particular, significant reduction in total dry weight was found in Nyangoo, Magwe and VC. Leaf specific area under shading treatment showed increment tendency and remarkable increase in this parameter was found in Nyangoo and VC, which cultivars decreased total dry weight under shading, indicating that shading treatment lead to thin of the leaf thickness. The ratio of plant height to diameter of stem was significantly decreased in R-288-8, Kanti and Yezin-5 by shading, indicating the restriction of succulent growth under shading condition and these cultivars are superior in lodging resistance to other cultivars. Photosynthetic rate as evaluated by electron transport rate sealed by vaseline was decreased by shading treatment. The extent of decrease in photosynthetic potential was found cultivaral difference. According to these results, Kanti is capable of applicable to the highest in resistance to shading and its recovery.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced total dry weight of all cultivars.

Treatment
Shading treatmente0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading treatment reduced total dry weight of all cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nyangoo, Magwe and VC had significant reductions in total dry weight.

Material
Nyangoo, Magwe and VCe0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant reduction in total dry weight was found in Nyangoo, Magwe and VC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf specific area tended to increase under shading.

Treatment
shading treatmente0
Outcome
Leaf specific areae0
Direction
increment tendencye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf specific area under shading treatment showed increment tendency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nyangoo and VC showed a marked increase in leaf specific area.

Material
Nyangoo and VCe0
Outcome
this parametere0
Direction
remarkable increasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“remarkable increase in this parameter was found in Nyangoo and VC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly decreased height to stem diameter ratio in R-288-8, Kanti and Yezin-5.

Material
R-288-8, Kanti and Yezin-5e0
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
ratio of plant height to diameter of steme0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of plant height to diameter of stem was significantly decreased in R-288-8, Kanti and Yezin-5 by shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased photosynthetic rate estimated by electron transport rate.

Treatment
shading treatmente0
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate as evaluated by electron transport rate sealed by vaseline was decreased by shading treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed in the extent of photosynthetic potential decrease.

Material
cultivarale0
Outcome
photosynthetic potentiale0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extent of decrease in photosynthetic potential was found cultivaral difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Kanti was judged most resistant to shading and best at recovery.

Material
Kantie0
Outcome
resistance to shading and its recoverye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kanti is capable of applicable to the highest in resistance to shading and its recovery.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

shade · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.