Paper · 2012 · Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment

Evaluation of Sesbania sesban L. (Merr) and Mimosa invisa L. (Fabaceae) as sources of nitrogen in irrigated rice on the Vertisols of the Accra Plains of Ghana

K. K. Nyalemegbe

12
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sesbania sesban L. (Merr) and Mimosa invisa L. (Fabaceae) were grown in rotation with lowland rice (var. KRC Baika). The experiments were conducted on three farmers’ fields at the Kpong Irrigation Project (KIP) sites at Akuse (lat 6° 06' N, long 0° 07' E) and Asutsuare (lat 6° 04' N, long 0° 12' E). In Farm 1, S. sesban and M. invisa were incorporated three times, in rotation with rice, over a period of 3 years, and in Farm 2, the green manures were incorporated once and rice planted within the year. The treatments also included a control (no fertilization), recommended inorganic nitrogen (N) that is, 90 kg N ha-1, S. sesban + 50% N and S. sesban + 75% N. Total dry matter and grain (paddy) yield of rice were higher in Farm 1 than Farm 2. Nitrogen contents of the S. sesban and M. invisa plants were 2.5 and 2.4% respectively. Total N of S. sesban ranged from 239 to 259 kg ha-1 and that of M. invisa ranged from 152 to 186 kg ha-1. The single incorporation of the green manures in Farm 2 did not have a significant impact on rice growth and grain yield, while in Farm 1, S.sesban and M. invisa gave comparable yields with those under the recommended inorganic N. Grain yields under S. sesban + 50% N (T2) and mimosa (T4) were comparable to that under the recommended inorganic fertilizer (T5) and both were significantly higher than the control (T6); grain yields were 5.8, 5.8, 6.5 and 3.9 t ha-1, in T2, T4, T5 and T6, respectively. In spite of the good performance of M. invisa it required upland conditions to grow and establish. The application of 50% N requirement, in addition to S. sesban incorporation, enhanced rice growth and yield, and resulted in 20.7% savings on nitrogen fertilizer use. Key words: Green manure, lowland rice, inorganic nitrogen, rotation, incorporation, total dry weight, grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice dry matter and grain yield were higher on Farm 1 than Farm 2.

Outcome
Total dry matter and grain (paddy) yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Farm 2e0
Setting
Farm 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total dry matter and grain (paddy) yield of rice were higher in Farm 1 than Farm 2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania plants had 2.5% nitrogen content.

Taxon
S. sesbanSesbania sesbane0
Outcome
Nitrogen contentse0
Value
2.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania sesban
Sesbania sesban · TaxonCheng-Tao Lin · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen contents of the S. sesban and M. invisa plants were 2.5 and 2.4% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–835 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mimosa plants had 2.4% nitrogen content.

Taxon
M. invisaMimosa invisae0
Outcome
Nitrogen contentse0
Value
2.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mimosa invisa
Mimosa invisa · TaxonMeneerke bloem · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen contents of the S. sesban and M. invisa plants were 2.5 and 2.4% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–835 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania total nitrogen ranged from 239 to 259 kg ha-1.

Taxon
S. sesbanSesbania sesbane0
Outcome
Total Ne0
Value
239 to 259 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania sesban
Sesbania sesban · TaxonCheng-Tao Lin · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total N of S. sesban ranged from 239 to 259 kg ha-1 and that of M. invisa ranged from 152 to 186 kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–941 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mimosa total nitrogen ranged from 152 to 186 kg ha-1.

Taxon
M. invisaMimosa invisae0
Outcome
Total Ne0
Value
152 to 186 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mimosa invisa
Mimosa invisa · TaxonMeneerke bloem · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total N of S. sesban ranged from 239 to 259 kg ha-1 and that of M. invisa ranged from 152 to 186 kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single green manure incorporation had no significant impact on rice growth and grain yield.

Treatment
single incorporation of the green manurese0
Outcome
rice growth and grain yielde0
Direction
did not have a significant impacte0
Setting
Farm 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The single incorporation of the green manures in Farm 2 did not have a significant impact on rice growth and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated Sesbania incorporation gave rice yields comparable with recommended inorganic nitrogen.

Treatment
S.sesbane0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
recommended inorganic Ne0
Setting
Farm 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while in Farm 1, S.sesban and M. invisa gave comparable yields with those under the recommended inorganic N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1172 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total dry matter and grain (paddy) yield of rice were higher in Farm 1 than Farm 2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated Mimosa incorporation gave rice yields comparable with recommended inorganic nitrogen.

Treatment
M. invisae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
recommended inorganic Ne0
Setting
Farm 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while in Farm 1, S.sesban and M. invisa gave comparable yields with those under the recommended inorganic N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1172 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total dry matter and grain (paddy) yield of rice were higher in Farm 1 than Farm 2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania plus 50% nitrogen gave 5.8 t ha-1 grain yield, significantly above control.

Treatment
S. sesban + 50% Ne0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.8e0
Qualifier
3.9 t ha-1e0
Comparator
control (T6)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields under S. sesban + 50% N (T2) and mimosa (T4) were comparable to that under the recommended inorganic fertilizer (T5) and both were significantly higher than the control (T6); grain yields were 5.8, 5.8, 6.5 and 3.9 t ha-1, in T2, T4, T5 and T6, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1444 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total dry matter and grain (paddy) yield of rice were higher in Farm 1 than Farm 2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mimosa gave 5.8 t ha-1 grain yield, significantly above control.

Treatment
mimosa (T4)e0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.8e0
Comparator
control (T6)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields under S. sesban + 50% N (T2) and mimosa (T4) were comparable to that under the recommended inorganic fertilizer (T5) and both were significantly higher than the control (T6); grain yields were 5.8, 5.8, 6.5 and 3.9 t ha-1, in T2, T4, T5 and T6, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1444 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total dry matter and grain (paddy) yield of rice were higher in Farm 1 than Farm 2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mimosa required upland conditions to establish.

Taxon
M. invisaMimosa invisae0
Outcome
required upland conditions to grow and establishe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mimosa invisa
Mimosa invisa · TaxonMeneerke bloem · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spite of the good performance of M. invisa it required upland conditions to grow and establish.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania incorporation with 50% nitrogen improved rice growth and yield and saved 20.7% nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
50% N requirement, in addition to S. sesban incorporatione0
Outcome
rice growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
20.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 50% N requirement, in addition to S. sesban incorporation, enhanced rice growth and yield, and resulted in 20.7% savings on nitrogen fertilizer use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1711 · show in text ↑

Sesbania sesban · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

271 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,183 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.