Paper · 1993 · Plant and Cell Physiology

Properties of the Signal Transduction Pathway in the Blue Light Response of Stomatal Guard Cells of Vicia faba and Commelina benghalensis

Ken-ichiro Shimazaki; Kenji Omasa; Toshinori Kinoshita; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Blue light-dependent proton extrusion in guard cell protoplasts from Vicia faba and light-dependent stomatal opening in the epidermis of Commelina benghalensis are inhibited by the calmodulin (CaM) antagonist, N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-l-naphthalenesulfononamide (W-7) and the myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) inhibitor, 1-(5-iodonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl)-lH- hexahydro-1,4-diazepine (ML-7) [Shimazaki, K., Kinoshita, T. and Nishimura, M. (1992) Plant Physiol. 99: 1416]. We now suggest that the inhibition occurs in the blue light signaling pathway without affecting the proton pump. Addition of fusicoccin (FC), an activator of H+-ATPase, to the protoplasts and the epidermis whose blue light-dependent proton extrusion and light-dependent stomatal opening had been inhibited by W-7 and ML-7, induced both proton extrusion and stomatal opening, respectively. Blue light-dependent proton extrusion was inhibited by K-252a, a wide-range inhibitor of protein kinases, and KT5926, a selective inhibitor of MLCK. FC induced proton extrusion in the presence of K-252a and KT5926. In contrast, phenylmercuric acetate (PMA), carbonyl cyanide-m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) and N, N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD) inhibited both the proton extrusion and stomatal opening, but FC did not induce the responses. These results suggest that W-7, ML-7, K-252a and KT5926 inhibit the signal transduction process by which the perception of blue light is transduced into activation of the proton pump in guard cells, and that MLCK or MLCK-like protein is involved in the blue light response of stomata. The possibility that calcium-dependent, calmodulin independent protein kinase [Harper, J.F. et al. (1991) Science 252: 951] functions rather than MLCK in the blue light response of stomata should be noted, however.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusicoccin restored proton extrusion and stomatal opening after W-7 and ML-7 inhibition.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
fusicoccin (FC)e0
Outcome
proton extrusion and stomatal openinge0
Direction
inducede0
Comparator
inhibited by W-7 and ML-7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of fusicoccin (FC), an activator of H+-ATPase, to the protoplasts and the epidermis whose blue light-dependent proton extrusion and light-dependent stomatal opening had been inhibited by W-7 and ML-7, induced both proton extrusion and stomatal opening, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba and Commelina benghalensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K-252a and KT5926 inhibited blue-light proton extrusion.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
K-252ae0
Outcome
Blue light-dependent proton extrusione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Blue light-dependent proton extrusion was inhibited by K-252a, a wide-range inhibitor of protein kinases, and KT5926, a selective inhibitor of MLCK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba and Commelina benghalensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FC induced proton extrusion despite kinase inhibitors.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
FCe0
Outcome
proton extrusione0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FC induced proton extrusion in the presence of K-252a and KT5926.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba and Commelina benghalensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PMA, CCCP and DCCD inhibited proton extrusion and stomatal opening, which FC did not restore.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
phenylmercuric acetate (PMA)e0
Outcome
proton extrusion and stomatal openinge0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phenylmercuric acetate (PMA), carbonyl cyanide-m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) and N, N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD) inhibited both the proton extrusion and stomatal opening, but FC did not induce the responses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba and Commelina benghalensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–137 · show in text ↑

fusicoccin · physiology: gas exchange · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.