Paper · 2011 · Scientific Research and Essays

Changes in fruit yield and quality in response to foliar and soil humic acid application in cucumber

Halime Ünlü; Hüsnü Ünlü; Yaşar Karakurt; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the influence of foliar and soil humic acid (HA) treatment on fruit quality and yield of cucumber grown under soil conditions in a greenhouse. Different concentrations of HA (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 ml/L) were applied to cucumber plants through either foliar spraying or drenching in the root area. Foliar and soil HA applications led to significantly higher mean fruit weight, early and total yield than the control. HA treatments had no significant effect on skin chlorophyll b, mesocarp chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll contents, fruit length and diameter. Both soil and foliar HA treatments significantly increased total and reducing sugar contents. Moreover, HA application significantly influenced fruit skin total chlorophyll content and this effect was mainly on chlorophyll a content. The study shows that cucumber fruit yield and quality can significantly be improved with soil and foliar HA application. Key words: Cucumber, humic acid, quality, yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar and soil humic acid applications gave significantly higher mean fruit weight, early yield and total yield than the control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Foliar and soil HA applicationse1
Outcome
mean fruit weight, early and total yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar and soil HA applications led to significantly higher mean fruit weight, early and total yield than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid treatments had no significant effect on skin chlorophyll b or mesocarp chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll contents.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
HA treatmentse1
Outcome
skin chlorophyll b, mesocarp chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll contentse1
Direction
no significant effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“HA treatments had no significant effect on skin chlorophyll b, mesocarp chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll contents, fruit length and diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid treatments had no significant effect on fruit length and diameter.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
HA treatmentse1
Outcome
fruit length and diametere1
Direction
no significant effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“HA treatments had no significant effect on skin chlorophyll b, mesocarp chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll contents, fruit length and diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar humic acid treatments significantly increased total and reducing sugar contents.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
soil and foliar HA treatmentse1
Outcome
total and reducing sugar contentse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both soil and foliar HA treatments significantly increased total and reducing sugar contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid application significantly influenced fruit skin total chlorophyll content, mainly through chlorophyll a content.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
HA applicatione1
Outcome
fruit skin total chlorophyll contente1
Qualifier
mainly on chlorophyll a contente1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“HA application significantly influenced fruit skin total chlorophyll content and this effect was mainly on chlorophyll a content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–832 · show in text ↑

other · physiology: pigments · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

other · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 65 positive, 8 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

other · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.