Paper · 1992 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Glomus intraradixeffects on citrus rootstock seedling growth in various potting media

S. Nemec

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
29
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Five potting media components mixed in various combinations and in various percentages of one with another (0, 14·3, 29, 42, 57, 71 and 100% by volume of the second component with the first) were inoculated with Glomus intraradix in six experiments. Seedlings of citrus rootstocks were grown from seed in these mixes. Sour orange in inoculated peat plus vermiculite, Astatula fine sand plus vermiculite, and peat plus Perlite® in all percentage combinations grew c. two- to threefold taller than noninoculated control plants. Up to twofold growth increases of sour orange occurred in vermiculite amended with wood shavings. The best evidence for fungus-mediated plant growth occurred in Astatula fine sand amended with 29–71% Perlite, and the roots in that combination had the highest percentage of infection. In another experiment in which Astatula fine sand was amended with up to 16% of an acid peat, ratios of inoculated rough lemon plant growth to controls decreased as the peat content in the medium increased. Top and root weight ratios of inoculated:control seedlings in the six experiments did not fit four simple linear models.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradix inoculation increased sour orange seedling growth about two- to threefold in peat plus vermiculite, Astatula fine sand plus vermiculite and peat plus Perlite media.

Taxon
Sour orangeCitrus ×aurantiume1
Treatment
inoculated with Glomus intraradixe2
Interactor
Glomus intraradixe2symbiont
Outcome
seedling growtht0
Direction
grewe1
Value
c. two- to threefolde1
Qualifier
in all percentage combinationse1
Comparator
noninoculated control plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantium
Citrus ×aurantium · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“citrus rootstock seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sour orange in inoculated peat plus vermiculite, Astatula fine sand plus vermiculite, and peat plus Perlite® in all percentage combinations grew c. two- to threefold taller than noninoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–532 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculated with Glomus intraradix in six experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–256 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sour orange growth increased up to twofold in vermiculite amended with wood shavings.

Taxon
sour orangeCitrus ×aurantiume3
Treatment
vermiculite amended with wood shavingse3
Outcome
growthe3
Direction
increasese3
Value
Up to twofolde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantium
Citrus ×aurantium · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Up to twofold growth increases of sour orange occurred in vermiculite amended with wood shavings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus rootstock seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest percentage of root infection occurred in Astatula fine sand amended with 29–71% Perlite.

Taxon
citrus rootstockt0
Organ / stage
rootse4
Treatment
Astatula fine sand amended with 29–71% Perlitee4
Outcome
percentage of infectione4
Direction
higheste4

Verbatim

e4

“The best evidence for fungus-mediated plant growth occurred in Astatula fine sand amended with 29–71% Perlite, and the roots in that combination had the highest percentage of infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus rootstock seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungus-mediated growth of citrus rootstock was best in Astatula fine sand amended with 29–71% Perlite.

Taxon
citrus rootstockt0
Treatment
Astatula fine sand amended with 29–71% Perlitee4
Outcome
fungus-mediated plant growthe4
Direction
beste4

Verbatim

e4

“The best evidence for fungus-mediated plant growth occurred in Astatula fine sand amended with 29–71% Perlite, and the roots in that combination had the highest percentage of infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus rootstock seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ratios of inoculated rough lemon growth to controls decreased as the peat content of Astatula fine sand rose up to 16%.

Taxon
rough lemonCitrus jambhirie5
Treatment
amended with up to 16% of an acid peate5
Outcome
ratios of inoculated rough lemon plant growth to controlse5
Direction
decreasede5
Qualifier
as the peat content in the medium increasede5
Comparator
controlse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus jambhiri
Citrus jambhiri · TaxonTon Rulkens from Mozambique · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In another experiment in which Astatula fine sand was amended with up to 16% of an acid peat, ratios of inoculated rough lemon plant growth to controls decreased as the peat content in the medium increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus rootstock seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top and root weight ratios of inoculated to control seedlings did not fit four simple linear models.

Taxon
citrus rootstockt0
Outcome
Top and root weight ratiose6
Comparator
controle6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e6

“Top and root weight ratios of inoculated:control seedlings in the six experiments did not fit four simple linear models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus rootstock seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–60 · show in text ↑

Glomus · growth · Citrus x aurantium (sour orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Citrus x aurantium (sour orange)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.