Abstract
SUMMARY In a factorialized field trial cells of Bacillus subtilis or phenylmercuric nitrate (PMN) were applied as sprays in autumn to manually defoliated apple trees, cv. Bramley's Seedling, artificially infected with Nectria galligena. Trees were additionally sprayed with dithianon at intervals in May and June or left unsprayed at this time. B. subtilis in conjunction with dithianon, and PMN with dithianon were equally effective in the control of canker over a 2‐yr period. Dithianon alone gave some control, as did PMN but B. subtilis was not effective without additional applications of dithianon.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus subtilis with dithianon and phenylmercuric nitrate with dithianon were equally effective in controlling canker
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae1 - Material
- Bramley's Seedlinge1
- Treatment
- B. subtilis in conjunction with dithianone2
- Interactor
- Nectria galligena
Neonectria galligenae1pathogen - Second interactor
- B. subtilis
Bacillus subtilise2biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- control of cankere2
- Direction
- equally effectivee2
- Comparator
- PMN with dithianone2
- Setting
- field triale1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“In a factorialized field trial cells of Bacillus subtilis or phenylmercuric nitrate (PMN) were applied as sprays in autumn to manually defoliated apple trees, cv. Bramley's Seedling, artificially infected with Nectria galligena”
e2“B. subtilis in conjunction with dithianon, and PMN with dithianon were equally effective in the control of canker”
Claim · model-written summary
Dithianon alone gave some control of apple canker compared with unsprayed trees
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- Dithianone3
- Interactor
- Nectria galligenaNeonectria galligenae1pathogen
- Outcome
- controle3
- Direction
- gave some controle3
- Comparator
- left unsprayede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“In a factorialized field trial cells of Bacillus subtilis or phenylmercuric nitrate (PMN) were applied as sprays in autumn to manually defoliated apple trees, cv. Bramley's Seedling, artificially infected with Nectria galligena”
e3“Dithianon alone gave some control, as did PMN but B. subtilis was not effective without additional applications of dithianon”
e4“Trees were additionally sprayed with dithianon at intervals in May and June or left unsprayed at this time”
Claim · model-written summary
Phenylmercuric nitrate alone gave some control of apple canker compared with unsprayed trees
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- phenylmercuric nitrate (PMN)e1
- Interactor
- Nectria galligenaNeonectria galligenae1pathogen
- Outcome
- controle3
- Direction
- gave some controle3
- Comparator
- left unsprayede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“In a factorialized field trial cells of Bacillus subtilis or phenylmercuric nitrate (PMN) were applied as sprays in autumn to manually defoliated apple trees, cv. Bramley's Seedling, artificially infected with Nectria galligena”
e3“Dithianon alone gave some control, as did PMN but B. subtilis was not effective without additional applications of dithianon”
e4“Trees were additionally sprayed with dithianon at intervals in May and June or left unsprayed at this time”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus subtilis alone was not effective against apple canker without additional dithianon applications
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- B. subtilise3
- Interactor
- Nectria galligenaNeonectria galligenae1pathogen
- Second interactor
- B. subtilisBacillus subtilise3biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- controle3
- Direction
- was not effectivee3
- Qualifier
- without additional applications of dithianone3
- Comparator
- left unsprayede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“In a factorialized field trial cells of Bacillus subtilis or phenylmercuric nitrate (PMN) were applied as sprays in autumn to manually defoliated apple trees, cv. Bramley's Seedling, artificially infected with Nectria galligena”
e3“Dithianon alone gave some control, as did PMN but B. subtilis was not effective without additional applications of dithianon”
e4“Trees were additionally sprayed with dithianon at intervals in May and June or left unsprayed at this time”
The same questions in other papers
dithianon · Neonectria galligena · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.