Paper · 2009 · Plant Soil and Environment

Influence of uniconazole and plant density on nitrogen content and grain quality in winter wheat in South China

H. Han; W. Yang

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Superior protein quality and consistent processing quality is needed for winter wheat marketing in South China. It has been shown that uniconazole concentration and plant density are certainly related to crop growth. An experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of uniconazole concentration and plant density on nitrogen content and grain quality in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Trials were managed to provide three levels of density (90 × 104, 180 × 104, and 270 × 104 per ha) over plots receiving four levels of uniconazole concentrations (0, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg) which were applied to seeds before sowing. The results revealed that the contents of N accumulated in ear, stem, and leaf were higher in uniconazole concentrations than that in control, and the effect of uniconazole on main stem was bigger than that on tillers. The grain protein was significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher in uniconazole concentrations than that in control. Uniconazole at 20 mg/kg was the most favorable for improving grain protein and protein fractions. Application of uniconazole concentrations also significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) increased WGC (wet gluten content) and SDS (sedimentation volumes), prolonged DDT (dough development time) and DST (dough stable time), and improved WA (water absorption), increased VV (valorimeter value), and subsequently improved the processing quality of wheat grains. These results suggest that a combination of uniconazole concentration and plant density should be applied in South China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole increased nitrogen accumulation in wheat ear, stem, and leaf compared with control.

Taxon
ear, stem, and leafe0
Treatment
uniconazole concentrationse0
Outcome
contents of N accumulated in ear, stem, and leafe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the contents of N accumulated in ear, stem, and leaf were higher in uniconazole concentrations than that in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole affected the main stem more than tillers.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
uniconazolee0
Outcome
effect of uniconazole on main steme0
Direction
biggere0
Comparator
tillerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of uniconazole on main stem was bigger than that on tillers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole significantly raised grain protein relative to control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
uniconazole concentrationse0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain protein was significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) higher in uniconazole concentrations than that in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole at 20 mg/kg was most favorable for grain protein and protein fractions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Uniconazole at 20 mg/kge0
Outcome
grain protein and protein fractionse0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uniconazole at 20 mg/kg was the most favorable for improving grain protein and protein fractions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole significantly increased wet gluten content and sedimentation volume.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
uniconazole concentrationse0
Outcome
WGC (wet gluten content) and SDS (sedimentation volumes)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of uniconazole concentrations also significantly (LSD, P < 0.05) increased WGC (wet gluten content) and SDS (sedimentation volumes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole prolonged dough development and stability times.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
DDT (dough development time) and DST (dough stable time)e0
Direction
prolongede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prolonged DDT (dough development time) and DST (dough stable time)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole improved water absorption.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
WA (water absorption)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved WA (water absorption)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole increased valorimeter value.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
VV (valorimeter value)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased VV (valorimeter value)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole improved wheat grain processing quality.

Outcome
processing quality of wheat grainse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“subsequently improved the processing quality of wheat grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1407 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combining uniconazole concentration and plant density in South China.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
combination of uniconazole concentration and plant density should be appliede0
Setting
South Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that a combination of uniconazole concentration and plant density should be applied in South China.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑

uniconazole · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.