Paper · 1991 · Physiologia Plantarum

Uniconazole‐induced thermotolerance in wheat seedlings is mediated by transpirational cooling

H. M. Booker; T. J. Gillespie; G. Hofstra; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seed treatment of thermotolerant and sensitive cultivars of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Frederick and Glenlea, respectively) with uniconazole reduced shoot and increased root fresh and dry weights. When subjected to 48°C for 6 h, treated seedlings had lower leaf‐temperatures and overall higher rates of evapotranspiration. Percent survival 11 days after high temperature incubation in untreated seedlings was 53% in Frederick and 30% in Glenlea, whereas in uniconazole‐treated seedlings it was 94% and 80%, respectively. Transpiration resistance markedly increased in the control cultivars after 4 h of high‐temperature incubation, but remained relatively unchanged in the treated cultivars. The increased root to shoot ratio exhibited in treated plants may have alleviated guard cell stress, even under high evaporative demand. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements on leaves of heat‐stressed seedlings indicated that increased photosynthetic metabolism in treated seedlings was correlated with lower leaf temperatures. High‐temperature stress resulted in a dramatic decline in pigments and proteins in thylakoid extracts of control seedlings but not in extracts from treated seedlings. Integrity of thylakoid pigment protein complexes, as illustrated by reduced relative amounts of free pigment, was maintained after exposure to high temperatures in treated seedlings. Furthermore, the treated Glenlea seedlings displayed a reduction in the monomeric form of Sight‐harvesting chlorophyll protein II (LHCP II) compared to control and Frederick seedlings. The heat‐tolerant Frederick cultivar showed a greater protective effect from uniconazole treatment than the sensitive Glenlea cultivar. Uniconazole treatment did not affect heat‐shock protein (HSP) synthesis in mesocotyl tissue.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole reduced shoot fresh and dry weights.

Treatment
uniconazolee0
Outcome
shoote0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment of thermotolerant and sensitive cultivars of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Frederick and Glenlea, respectively) with uniconazole reduced shoot and increased root fresh and dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole increased root fresh and dry weights.

Treatment
uniconazolee0
Outcome
root fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment of thermotolerant and sensitive cultivars of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Frederick and Glenlea, respectively) with uniconazole reduced shoot and increased root fresh and dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated seedlings had lower leaf temperatures after heat exposure.

Treatment
treated seedlingse0
Outcome
leaf‐temperaturese0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
48°C for 6 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When subjected to 48°C for 6 h, treated seedlings had lower leaf‐temperatures and overall higher rates of evapotranspiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–327 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated seedlings had higher evapotranspiration after heat exposure.

Treatment
treated seedlingse0
Outcome
rates of evapotranspiratione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When subjected to 48°C for 6 h, treated seedlings had lower leaf‐temperatures and overall higher rates of evapotranspiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–327 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frederick survival was 94% with uniconazole versus 53% untreated.

Material
Fredericke0
Treatment
uniconazole‐treatede0
Outcome
Percent survivale0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
94%e0
Qualifier
53%e0
Comparator
untreated seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percent survival 11 days after high temperature incubation in untreated seedlings was 53% in Frederick and 30% in Glenlea, whereas in uniconazole‐treated seedlings it was 94% and 80%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–525 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glenlea survival was 80% with uniconazole versus 30% untreated.

Material
Glenleae0
Treatment
uniconazole‐treatede0
Outcome
Percent survivale0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
30%e0
Comparator
untreated seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percent survival 11 days after high temperature incubation in untreated seedlings was 53% in Frederick and 30% in Glenlea, whereas in uniconazole‐treated seedlings it was 94% and 80%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–525 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High heat increased transpiration resistance in controls.

Material
control cultivarse0
Outcome
Transpiration resistancee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
4 h of high‐temperature incubatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transpiration resistance markedly increased in the control cultivars after 4 h of high‐temperature incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration resistance remained relatively unchanged in treated cultivars.

Treatment
treated cultivarse0
Outcome
Transpiration resistancee1
Direction
relatively unchangede0
Comparator
control cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but remained relatively unchanged in the treated cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–696 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transpiration resistance markedly increased in the control cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated seedlings had greater photosynthetic metabolism correlated with lower leaf temperatures.

Outcome
photosynthetic metabolisme0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
lower leaf temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased photosynthetic metabolism in treated seedlings was correlated with lower leaf temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat sharply reduced thylakoid pigments and proteins in controls.

Organ / stage
thylakoid extractse0
Treatment
High‐temperature stresse0
Outcome
pigments and proteinse0
Direction
dramatic declinee0
Comparator
control seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High‐temperature stress resulted in a dramatic decline in pigments and proteins in thylakoid extracts of control seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1149 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat did not produce the same pigment and protein decline in treated seedlings.

Treatment
treated seedlingse0
Outcome
pigments and proteinse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
control seedlingse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not in extracts from treated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1192 · show in text ↑
e1

“dramatic decline in pigments and proteins in thylakoid extracts of control seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1149 · show in text ↑
e2

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated seedlings maintained thylakoid pigment protein complex integrity after heat.

Outcome
Integrity of thylakoid pigment protein complexese0
Qualifier
after exposure to high temperaturese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integrity of thylakoid pigment protein complexes, as illustrated by reduced relative amounts of free pigment, was maintained after exposure to high temperatures in treated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1375 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated Glenlea showed less monomeric LHCP II than control and Frederick.

Material
Glenleae0
Treatment
treated Glenlea seedlingse0
Gene
Sight‐harvesting chlorophyll protein II (LHCP II)e0
Outcome
monomeric forme0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
control and Frederick seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treated Glenlea seedlings displayed a reduction in the monomeric form of Sight‐harvesting chlorophyll protein II (LHCP II) compared to control and Frederick seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1560 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frederick gained greater heat protection from uniconazole than Glenlea.

Material
Fredericke0
Treatment
uniconazole treatmente0
Outcome
protective effecte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Glenleae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The heat‐tolerant Frederick cultivar showed a greater protective effect from uniconazole treatment than the sensitive Glenlea cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1696 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole did not alter HSP synthesis in mesocotyl tissue.

Organ / stage
mesocotyl tissuee0
Treatment
Uniconazole treatmente0
Outcome
heat‐shock protein (HSP) synthesise0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uniconazole treatment did not affect heat‐shock protein (HSP) synthesis in mesocotyl tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1789 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑

uniconazole · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

heat · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 8 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.